Telephone
02-77093611
Line
@fdlaw
address
17th Floor, No. 180, Section 2, Dunhua South Road, Da'an District, Taipei City
Telephone
02-77093611
Line
@fdlaw
address
17th Floor, No. 180, Section 2, Dunhua South Road, Da'an District, Taipei City
The core of trade secret cases is not just whether the information is important, but whether the company has established reasonable confidentiality measures. For technology companies, information technology companies, manufacturers, distributors, and consulting services companies, system design, cybersecurity records, and contract management often determine the outcome of litigation.
It is necessary to confirm the confidentiality, economic value, and reasonable confidentiality measures. If the company does not have the authority to control, label, provide training, and manage the resignation process, the litigation will be very unfavorable.
NDA, employee confidentiality clauses, non-compete agreements, and customer data protection should be designed in conjunction with job descriptions and compensation arrangements.
Download records, emails sent, cloud access, USB usage, document handover, and employment information with competing companies should be quickly verified.
Trade secret cases often require simultaneous handling of preliminary injunctions, civil claims, criminal complaints, and digital evidence preservation.
Fidelity Law Firm is led by senior lawyers with twenty years of experience in commercial law, corporate counsel, and major criminal and litigation cases. The lead attorney has extensive experience working with accountants, possessing in-depth knowledge of corporate governance, accounting documents, contractual processes, transaction arrangements, and their relationship to courtroom adversarial proceedings. This is a significant advantage for the firm in handling complex cases that intersect commercial and criminal matters.
If a company, its manager, civil servant, business owner, or brand operator has received notification, is involved in a dispute, or is about to sign a major contract, it is recommended to first organize the contracts, ledgers, financial records, transaction records, and notification documents, and have a lawyer make a preliminary assessment of the next steps.
First, system records, download records, emails, cloud access records, handover records upon departure, and data access settings should be preserved. Then, a lawyer should determine whether it is appropriate to apply for preservation, file a lawsuit, or negotiate.
It's still possible, but it will be more difficult. The court will examine whether the company has other reasonable confidentiality measures, such as access control, signage, training, access control, and information security records.
Not necessarily. It is necessary to examine whether the protected interests, scope of restrictions, duration, geographical location, job-related aspects, and compensation are reasonable.
Trade secrets and information security should not be addressed only after data is leaked. Companies should plan for them together, including confidentiality agreements, access control, handover procedures for departing employees, non-compete agreements, and evidence collection processes.
First, confirm the secrecy, economic value, and reasonable confidentiality measures, and then assess civil and criminal remedies.
Customer lists, source code, quotations, technical data, and internal documents should be hierarchical, access-based, labeled, and tracked.
Contract terms must be aligned with actual data flow and employee management; they cannot simply be written on paper.