Criminal Law and Criminal Procedure

Our firm is a professional team of criminal litigation lawyers, composed of a group of criminal lawyers in Taipei, specializing in criminal litigation, criminal prosecution agency, criminal investigation defense, criminal defense in trial proceedings, police interrogation accompaniment, investigation accompaniment, police inquiry, investigation accompaniment, and detention court The senior lawyer has 20 years of experience in defense, bail application, appeal, and debate strategy planning. He has rich practical experience and strives for the maximum legal rights and interests of his clients.

Called "How dare Leehom" and received a openly insulting letter?

罵人力宏敢啦,是否構成公然侮辱。李育昇律師解說
Will using new popular terms such as "Lehom Dare" constitute a public insult? Recently, the Leehom Wang incident has caused quite a stir and has become a hot topic. Previously, a young girl was drunk and wildly proclaimed "How dare Leehom". However, she was so drunk that she was sent a openly insulting letter.

The penalties related to the death of a Korean female international student killed by a drunk driver are unconstitutional! ? Lawyer Li Yusheng explains drunk driving laws

李育昇律師,台北律師推薦,台北法律顧問
A Taiwanese female international student was killed in a drunk driving car accident in South Korea. The South Korean court sentenced the perpetrator to 8 years in prison in the first and second trials. However, in the third trial, the South Korean Constitutional Court found that the law applicable to the case was unconstitutional, so the original judgment was revoked and remanded. During the review, lawyer Li Yusheng explained the differences between Korean law and Taiwanese law and raised issues.

What to do if a family member is taken away by the police? Emergency procedures from police questioning to transfer to detention.

緊急找律師,刑事律師

When a family member is suddenly taken away by the police, do not rush to explain the case to them, nor repeatedly inquire at different police stations. The first thing to do is to confirm: which police station, precinct, investigation bureau, or other unit the person is currently in; the handling unit and contact information; the general nature of the case; whether it is a notification to appear, arrest, detention, or other procedure; whether a police statement is being taken or about to be taken; and whether the police may transfer the case to the district prosecutor's office. If the information is incomplete, write down the known time, location, and contact person for later verification with the handling officer or lawyer. First, confirm these six pieces of information: the police station, precinct, investigation bureau, or other unit the family member is currently in; the handling unit, handling officer, or contact number; the general nature of the case; whether it is a notification to appear, arrest, detention, or other procedure…

What to do if sentenced in the first instance? Key points of criminal appeals and re-examination of judgments in the second instance.

刑事被告,刑事律師,刑事辯護律師推薦,刑事上訴三審

If you or a family member has just received an unfavorable first-instance criminal judgment, don't just look at the "severance pay." You should immediately compile a list of the judgment's main text, the facts of the crime as determined by the court, the evidence accepted by the court, the arguments not accepted, the applicable law and charges, the sentencing rationale, whether there is any new evidence or information, and the status of the judgment's service and appeal proceedings. The core of preparing for the second instance is to specifically identify which facts, evidence, laws, procedures, or sentencing decisions in the first-instance judgment remain in dispute, rather than simply repeating what was already stated in the original trial. After a sentence is handed down in the first instance, the second instance is not simply repeating the first instance's verdict. A second-instance appeal should present specific reasons according to the current criminal procedure. An effective second-instance strategy typically involves comparing the first-instance judgment with the case file item by item, pointing out the factual findings, the selection and rejection of evidence, the retrieval of evidence, etc.