Telephone
02-77093611
Line
@fdlaw
address
17th Floor, No. 180, Section 2, Dunhua South Road, Da'an District, Taipei City
Telephone
02-77093611
Line
@fdlaw
address
17th Floor, No. 180, Section 2, Dunhua South Road, Da'an District, Taipei City
Our firm is provided by a group of criminal lawyers and is a Taipei law firm composed of criminal litigation lawyers. Based on 20 years of practical experience, we are good at criminal proceedings and criminal defense, specializing in corruption regulations, violations of banking laws, and violations of securities and exchange laws. , violations of commercial accounting laws, commercial misappropriation, fraud, telecommunications fraud, negligent injury in car accidents, reputational damage, damage, obstruction of official duties, public danger and other incidents, we have been selected as the strongest Taipei criminal lawyer recommendation. If you are suddenly arrested, receive a summons, request for detention, be detained, be searched, need to be interviewed by a lawyer in the detention center, need a lawyer to defend you, or if an active offender is arrested, please contact our firm immediately. Areas of expertise: criminal lawyer, criminal litigation lawyer, Taipei criminal lawyer, Taipei criminal litigation lawyer, Taipei criminal litigation lawyer recommendation, defense lawyer, investigation lawyer, investigation lawyer, prosecutor lawyer, lawyer defense, criminal law lawyer, sentenced, sentencing search Lawyer, lawyer exoneration, powerful lawyer, powerful criminal lawyer, Shilin lawyer, Shilin law firm, Shilin District Court, Shilin District Prosecutor's Office

News and video source: Woman buys "noise-making device" to retaliate against upstairs lawyer for making noise, places it on her bedside | ETtoday News. News link: In a New Taipei City community, a 73-year-old woman accused her upstairs neighbor of making noise such as dragging tables and chairs and shoving their footsteps. She bought a "noise-making device" online. The lawyer upstairs, annoyed by the noise for over a year, called the police, insisting he had never made any noise. Both sides gave conflicting accounts. When the police arrived, they found that the elderly woman hadn't placed the device on the ceiling, but rather on her bedside "against the wall," causing constant noise for a year. She was prosecuted for coercion. …

When a family member is suddenly taken away by the police, do not rush to explain the case to them, nor repeatedly inquire at different police stations. The first thing to do is to confirm: which police station, precinct, investigation bureau, or other unit the person is currently in; the handling unit and contact information; the general nature of the case; whether it is a notification to appear, arrest, detention, or other procedure; whether a police statement is being taken or about to be taken; and whether the police may transfer the case to the district prosecutor's office. If the information is incomplete, write down the known time, location, and contact person for later verification with the handling officer or lawyer. First, confirm these six pieces of information: the police station, precinct, investigation bureau, or other unit the family member is currently in; the handling unit, handling officer, or contact number; the general nature of the case; whether it is a notification to appear, arrest, detention, or other procedure…

If you or a family member has just received an unfavorable first-instance criminal judgment, don't just look at the "severance pay." You should immediately compile a list of the judgment's main text, the facts of the crime as determined by the court, the evidence accepted by the court, the arguments not accepted, the applicable law and charges, the sentencing rationale, whether there is any new evidence or information, and the status of the judgment's service and appeal proceedings. The core of preparing for the second instance is to specifically identify which facts, evidence, laws, procedures, or sentencing decisions in the first-instance judgment remain in dispute, rather than simply repeating what was already stated in the original trial. After a sentence is handed down in the first instance, the second instance is not simply repeating the first instance's verdict. A second-instance appeal should present specific reasons according to the current criminal procedure. An effective second-instance strategy typically involves comparing the first-instance judgment with the case file item by item, pointing out the factual findings, the selection and rejection of evidence, the retrieval of evidence, etc.