Criminal lawyer recommendations

Our firm is a professional team of criminal litigation lawyers, composed of a group of criminal lawyers in Taipei, specializing in criminal litigation, criminal prosecution agency, criminal investigation defense, criminal defense in trial proceedings, police interrogation accompaniment, investigation accompaniment, police inquiry, investigation accompaniment, and detention court The senior lawyer has 20 years of experience in defense, bail application, and debate strategy planning. He is recommended as the first choice for criminal lawyers. He has extremely rich practical experience and strives for the maximum legal rights and interests of his clients.

What can a criminal lawyer do? From police questioning, investigation, and detention to court trial.

刑事訴訟律師,刑事律師,台北刑事訴訟律師

This article quickly summarizes the role of a criminal litigation lawyer. Criminal litigation lawyers are crucial figures in the legal system; they represent the accused in criminal trials to ensure fair treatment. Criminal litigation lawyers must be familiar with criminal legal procedures and possess the ability to provide excellent defense and legal advice in court. The primary responsibility of a criminal litigation lawyer is to represent the defendant in court during criminal trials. During the trial, the lawyer will thoroughly study the case, including the facts, evidence, and law. The lawyer must understand the prosecution's charges and the evidence in order to build a strong defense. The lawyer will also study the law to identify any procedural loopholes that could be exploited to defend the defendant. Criminal litigation lawyers must also communicate with the defendant and…

What to do if a family member is taken away by the police? Emergency procedures from police questioning to transfer to detention.

緊急找律師,刑事律師

When a family member is suddenly taken away by the police, do not rush to explain the case to them, nor repeatedly inquire at different police stations. The first thing to do is to confirm: which police station, precinct, investigation bureau, or other unit the person is currently in; the handling unit and contact information; the general nature of the case; whether it is a notification to appear, arrest, detention, or other procedure; whether a police statement is being taken or about to be taken; and whether the police may transfer the case to the district prosecutor's office. If the information is incomplete, write down the known time, location, and contact person for later verification with the handling officer or lawyer. First, confirm these six pieces of information: the police station, precinct, investigation bureau, or other unit the family member is currently in; the handling unit, handling officer, or contact number; the general nature of the case; whether it is a notification to appear, arrest, detention, or other procedure…

What to do if sentenced in the first instance? Key points of criminal appeals and re-examination of judgments in the second instance.

刑事被告,刑事律師,刑事辯護律師推薦,刑事上訴三審

If you or a family member has just received an unfavorable first-instance criminal judgment, don't just look at the "severance pay." You should immediately compile a list of the judgment's main text, the facts of the crime as determined by the court, the evidence accepted by the court, the arguments not accepted, the applicable law and charges, the sentencing rationale, whether there is any new evidence or information, and the status of the judgment's service and appeal proceedings. The core of preparing for the second instance is to specifically identify which facts, evidence, laws, procedures, or sentencing decisions in the first-instance judgment remain in dispute, rather than simply repeating what was already stated in the original trial. After a sentence is handed down in the first instance, the second instance is not simply repeating the first instance's verdict. A second-instance appeal should present specific reasons according to the current criminal procedure. An effective second-instance strategy typically involves comparing the first-instance judgment with the case file item by item, pointing out the factual findings, the selection and rejection of evidence, the retrieval of evidence, etc.