Telephone
02-77093611
Line
@fdlaw
address
17th Floor, No. 180, Section 2, Dunhua South Road, Da'an District, Taipei City
Telephone
02-77093611
Line
@fdlaw
address
17th Floor, No. 180, Section 2, Dunhua South Road, Da'an District, Taipei City
Our firm is a patent, trademark and copyright law firm in Taipei. It is led by a lawyer with 20 years of practice and combined with an intellectual property rights team, specializing in patent application, trademark registration, copyright, intellectual property rights strategic planning and protection, intellectual property rights litigation, etc. Our staff come from large domestic and foreign firms. Our services are professional and our fees are reasonable. We have assisted more than a thousand domestic and foreign companies in arranging intellectual property rights and have won the trust of our customers. Service content: trademark application, patent application, legal consultant, trademark registration, legal consulting company, lawyer consultant, company legal consultant, patent application process, trademark application process, how to apply for a patent, patent layout, trademark infringement, patent infringement, patent infringement, Trademark infringement, copyright, trademark litigation, patent litigation

JISOO's company issued a statement denying authorization for its pop-up store, stating that merchandise at the Taipei event was twice as expensive as at overseas events. The organizer emphasized that all items were legally authorized. | Sanlih News reporters Lin Qinyu and Huang Zhengjie. News Link: Lawyer Li Yusheng of Fidelity Law Firm stated that if the Taiwanese organizer uses the official company's artist name or image without official authorization, it may infringe upon the official company's reputation and rights, and could constitute trademark infringement or even copyright infringement for profit, punishable by imprisonment for six to five years, a fine of NT$200,000 to NT$2 million, and civil liability. …

A jewelry store in Taipei City was sued for selling a gold bracelet engraved with the classic LV logo. The store claimed the value of gold lay in its weight and protested its innocence, stating that LV had sent people to gather evidence and file a lawsuit under trademark law. The store owner protested that a customer had specifically requested an LV bracelet, which is why she purchased and sold it. She argued that the value of the bracelet to her was the weight of the gold, not that she intentionally wanted to sell counterfeit luxury goods for profit. However, a lawyer stated that if a product bears the mark of a luxury brand, it is sufficient to mislead consumers and raises concerns about trademark infringement. Li Yusheng, an intellectual property lawyer at Fidelity Law Firm, stated…

Trademark Dispute! Bubble Tea Shop Named "moomoo" Targeted by E-commerce Platform MOMO | Next TV News, Era News Reporters Gu Jiazhen and Lin Junting News Link: A well-known bubble tea shop in Taipei has recently been embroiled in a trademark dispute. The main issue stems from the e-commerce platform MOMO, which believes the shop's trademark is misleading and has filed a trademark opposition, arguing that the trademark should be revoked. The bubble tea shop owner stated that the brand was created after they tasted delicious milk in Hokkaido and wanted to bring it back; the inspiration came from the sound of a cow mooing, and it has nothing to do with the e-commerce platform MOMO. The matter has been handed over to lawyers. Fidelity Law Firm…

SET Exclusive | Popular Tainan Tourist Orchard Accuses Tour Guides of "Image Theft and AI Editing" to Attract Customers, Collaboration Falls Apart! Accused of "Outright Image Theft," Caught and Then AI Re-edited, Accused of Image Theft and Re-editing to Attract Customers, Tour Guide Claims: Accidentally Uploaded, Post Removed | SET News Reporters Hsiao Yu-hsiu and Wang Yi-chi News Link: Lawyer Li Yu-sheng of Fidelity Law Firm stated that if someone reposts another person's image or re-edits it using AI without the original copyright holder's consent, it constitutes a reproduction or alteration of the copyrighted work, which may constitute copyright infringement, and may…

Li Yang, the first Minister of Sports, lost his 30 million endorsement fee: Completed compliance procedures | CTS News reporter Xu Tinglun News link: The Executive Yuan announced the personnel case of the newly established Minister of Sports yesterday (27th). The first Minister of Sports in Taiwan's history will be Li Yang, the two-time Olympic badminton gold medalist. As soon as the news came out, all walks of life paid close attention. Li Yang had a good image and had many endorsements in the past. Now, in order to avoid commercial disputes, he has to give up commercial cooperation. According to estimates, the loss may be at least 30 million! In response to this, Li Yang issued a statement, saying that he was grateful for the concern of the outside world and that he had completed all compliance procedures. Fidelity Law Firm...

A renowned surgeon is accused of fraudulent surgery, and a patient has filed a lawsuit. Three tumor surgeries have raised numerous questions. A renowned surgeon in Gengshen County is facing a medical dispute, alleging false information about the surgery. A patient is accusing the surgeon of falsifying medical records to defraud patients of surgery. (Reporters Xu Zhaowei and Nian Wanxuan) News link: Attorney Li Yusheng of Fidelity Law Firm stated that if a physician falsely provides a patient with a diagnosis in exchange for medical fees, a medical dispute may arise, potentially implicating him in the crime of fraud under the criminal law. Furthermore, physicians have an obligation to fully explain surgical procedures to patients. Failure to fulfill this obligation could result in civil liability for damages if the patient suffers harm during surgery, and in serious cases, could lead to professional negligence.

"Volcano Pizza" Wars! Domino's Officially Sues Pizza Hut. A Super Comparison! Two Similar Pizzas, Different in Flavor and Design. "Volcano Pizza" Wars! Pizza Leaders Head to Court | Reporter Cai Youxian and Wu Jiecheng. News Link: The "Volcano Pizza War" between Domino's and Pizza Hut continues to rage. In June of this year, Pizza Hut launched its "Volcano Lava Pizza," prompting competitor Domino's to protest, claiming it was the original creator of the volcano concept. Domino's has now issued a statement, stating that it has appointed a professional legal team to pursue legal action...

The "Volcano Pizza" War Continues! Domino's Accuses Pizza Hut of Plagiarism | CTS News Reporter Lu Yi News Link: The "Volcano Pizza War" between Domino's and Pizza Hut continues to rage. In June of this year, Pizza Hut launched its "Volcano Lava Pizza," prompting a strong protest from competitor Domino's, claiming it was the original creator of the volcano concept. Domino's has now issued a statement, confirming that it has commissioned a professional legal team to take legal action. Pizza Hut responded that it has not received any information regarding this matter and will cooperate if the dispute proceeds to legal proceedings, while also actively defending its brand rights. Attorney Li Yusheng of Fidelity Law Firm...

Liu Shifang's "Chu Li-lun is the mastermind" Jiang Wanan: The Minister of the Interior has no final say on illegality│CTS News reporters Song Yanmin, Yang Yuqing, and Zhang Junxuan News link: Kuomintang Chairman Chu Li-lun recently mobilized party members and supporters to gather outside the Taipei Prosecutors' Office. Minister of the Interior Liu Shifang pointed out that the prosecutors and police will target illegal gatherings and interview Chu Li-lun, legislator Xie Longjie, blue camp spokesperson Yang Zhiyu and other "masterminds"! This move has aroused dissatisfaction among KMT legislators, and Taipei Mayor Jiang Wanan even said that the Minister of the Interior does not have the final say! However, the Ministry of the Interior is the competent authority of the National Police Agency, so does it have jurisdiction over rallies and marches? Can the Minister of the Interior deny...

The Internet celebrity "Teacher Andy" complained that his channel, which he had run for 10 years, was taken away by his ex-girlfriend "Zhang Jianing's family" and they also revealed that the channel, which had generated revenues of over 100 million yuan, was suspected of "tax evasion" by Qunhai Company. The prosecutor interviewed the four members of the Zhang family. Jianing bowed 90 degrees with his eyes closed three times. On the other hand, his parents and sister avoided the media...

Ko Wen-je appeared in court for the first time after surgery! Chen Pei-chi listened to Xiaocao shouting "Come on, Abei" | CTS News reporter Zhao Ruo-ping News link: Former People's Party Chairman Ko Wen-je was involved in the Jinghuacheng scandal and political donations case. The Taipei District Court held another criminal trial this morning (17th). This was Ko Wen-je's first appearance in court after surgery. However, following the fierce confrontation between the prosecution and the defense at the last hearing, Ko Wen-je's lawyer made another move today, saying that Peng Zhensheng, Shao Xiupei and others were improperly questioned and denied the ability of their testimony to be evidence. Ko Wen-je's lawyer also presented a transcript translation, pointing out that the prosecutor used "Yu Wen" as an example, implying that Peng Zhensheng bit out Ko Wen-je, but the prosecutor responded to this...

A man in the underground mall of Taipei Main Station was arrested after he suspected that passers-by were secretly photographing him with their mobile phones. He lost his temper and made a scene in the store. When the store clerk approached him to show concern, he lost control and roared. Finally, the police arrived to persuade him, but he was still emotional and was finally prosecuted according to the Social Maintenance Act. Li Yusheng, an attorney at Fidelity Law Offices, said that if someone is photographed in a public place in a general scene and someone else is included in the photo, in principle it does not constitute an infringement of someone else's portrait rights. However, if you take a close-up of a specific person, it may infringe on that person's portrait rights. and…