An investment dispute broke out in a Hong Kong-style restaurant! A graffiti artist who was dissatisfied with the restaurant's failure to return his works in the middle of the night spray-painted graffiti and threatened to sue lawyer Li Yusheng to explain the relevant provisions of the crime of intimidation

An investment dispute broke out in a Hong Kong-style restaurant! A graffiti artist who was dissatisfied with the restaurant's failure to return his work in the middle of the night spray-painted the artist's graffiti and threatened to sue │ Sanli News reporter Xu Xiangyun Cheng Yixiang

News link:https://youtu.be/rqvGnzAPV2U?si=LXeDrz5KkIgaI0wr

A Hong Kong-style fast food restaurant in Taipei was jointly owned by a Hong Kong man and a Taiwanese artist. Unexpectedly, the two parties fell out. The artist repeatedly threatened the group and even ran outside the store to graffiti on the iron gate after the store closed. The store called the police and arrested him. Although a settlement was reached for NT$300,000, he was still fined NT$8,000 for the crime of intimidation and endangering safety.
Late at night, the man stayed awake and ran to the door of the restaurant with a spray paint can, spraying it on the rolling iron door, showing off his artistic talent. It was not that the store invited him to create a spray painting, but that he sprayed paint uninvited to threaten him.
The barbecued pork cooked with osmanthus honey juice is mouth-watering just by looking at it. The restaurant that was spray-painted is a Hong Kong-style restaurant in Datong District, Taipei. The owner is from Hong Kong and has built the restaurant into a gathering place for street fashion, and also has regular fixtures. Inviting artists to hold exhibitions unexpectedly led to trouble.
The police investigated that the man surnamed Jiang who caused the incident was engaged in graffiti art. Due to an investment dispute with the restaurant, he was dissatisfied that the works had not been returned. He successively threatened the group through messaging software, and even asked whether he wanted to become Zhu Xuezhang, or threatened to die in Taiwan. You, in the end, went to the restaurant to vent your anger by graffiti. The boss couldn't bear it and called the police and went to court. The man named Jiang said that he was temporarily confused. The two parties settled for 300,000 yuan, but the man named Jiang was still charged with intimidation and endangering safety and fined 8,000 yuan. .
Lawyer Li Yusheng from Fidelity Law Firm said: "Although the defendant in this case reached a settlement with the victim, because the crime of intimidation and endangering safety is a matter of prosecution, the judge considered the defendant's criminal motive, purpose, means and education level, and believed that the crime should still be punished. Given a certain level of punishment, the fine is still imposed to give the defendant a warning.”

# Crime of intimidation # Crime of intimidation endangering safety # Damage

Fuda Law Firm
Line：https://line.me/ti/p/@fdlaw
Tel:0277093611
Facebook:https://www.facebook.com/fudalawyer
website:https://fdlaw.com.tw/
e-mail:info@fdlaw.com.tw