Telephone
02-77093611
Line
@fdlaw
address
17th Floor, No. 180, Section 2, Dunhua South Road, Da'an District, Taipei City
Telephone
02-77093611
Line
@fdlaw
address
17th Floor, No. 180, Section 2, Dunhua South Road, Da'an District, Taipei City

Supervisors from Japan's Taiwan Sushiro Company came to Taiwan for inspection. Fidelity Law Firm serves as the legal counsel of Taiwan Sushiro Company. Today, the supervisors, supervisory committee members and Tokyo lawyers of the parent company Nippon Sushiro Company came to the firm for supervision and inspection and gave many valuable opinions and guidance! # Sushiro # Japanese business # Corporate legal advisor # Foreign legal advisor Fidelity Law Firm specializes in the field of legal counsel. The team of lawyer members all have rich professional experience and long-term experience in serving listed companies and small and medium-sized enterprises, and can provide assistance. If you have any needs, you can contact our firm at any time. Line:…

The murder case at New Taipei Junior High School shocked the whole Taiwan. The "godson brother and sister" involved in the case were transferred to the New Taipei District Prosecutor's Office|Next News reporter Lin Yiwen News link: The school murder that occurred in Tucheng, New Taipei City last Christmas shocked the whole Taiwan. A male junior high school student He was attacked with a sharp weapon and eventually died of his injuries. The "god brother" and "gossister" involved in the case were previously admitted to the Taipei Juvenile Care Center. Today (21st), the juvenile court ruling was released. Both of them were involved in the "most serious crime". A felony with a lighter sentence of more than 5 years will be transferred to the New Taipei District Prosecutor's Office, but both of them can protest again. Litigation process related to minor crimes Lawyer Li Yusheng from Fidelity Law Firm said that minor crimes will first be handled by the juvenile court...

Concerned about having a criminal record and refusing to take a sobriety test! Drunk man slandered the police: Give me a drink. "Maverick Supercar" was suspended and detained. Sanli News Reporter|Yang Xinyi and Cheng Yixiang News Link: A man in Beijing City recently drank and drove a friend's Lamborghini on the road. But he was stopped by the police while driving on a double yellow line. Not only did he refuse to cooperate with the sobriety test, he even said that the mineral water provided by the police was alcohol, which made the policeman sigh in frustration. In response, his lawyer said that although he refused to take the test, he would not have a criminal record. record, but compared with the administrative liability for drunk driving, it will not be lighter, and may be relatively heavier. Reporter Yang Xinyi: "A few days ago, this man not only drove a friend's car after drinking, he even drove on the double yellow line. Even though he was stopped by the police, he refused to cooperate with the alcohol test and the vehicle was seized on the spot." A friend’s Lamborghini roadster was suspended…

Yang Jinhua spent 60 million to buy a luxury house. The contract was terminated because the view was blocked. Mirror News reporters Tong Yajun and Zhang Xinzhi News link: In 2014, artist Yang Jinhua took a fancy to this luxury pre-sale house in Neihu, Taipei City, which was advertised as the "National Tennis Park" "First row" view. Through agency sales, she bought a house plus 2 parking spaces for more than 60 million. Unexpectedly, when it was about to be completed, she found that the view of the building was blocked, so she only paid more than 17 million, then refused to pay any more and went to bookkeeping with the builder. Court. In the end, the Taipei District Court determined that the builder did not make false advertisements and determined that Yang Jinhua must pay 9.42 million in liquidated damages. Lawyer Li Yusheng from Fidelity Law Firm said that in this case, Yang Jinhua felt that the builder and the agency had guaranteed the view of the house, and believed that the view of the house was blocked and therefore the builder breached the contract, but he...

How to protect yourself legally: Dealing with fraud In recent years, fraud cases have continued to increase, and many people may become victims of fraud. Legal responses and measures are crucial when you discover that you have been scammed. Here are the legal steps and measures you should take to protect yourself: Overall, when you become the victim of a scam, staying calm and acting immediately is key. Contact an attorney, report the crime to the police, preserve evidence, and actively participate in the legal process to ensure your rights are protected. After discovering that you have been defrauded, you should take the following actions immediately. In general, after discovering that you have been defrauded, it is crucial to stop trading immediately, retain evidence, report the case to the police, contact a lawyer, and notify relevant agencies. These actions will help protect your rights and bring fraudsters to justice. After discovering that you have been defrauded, you should take the following actions immediately. After being defrauded and sending money out, you have the opportunity to get...

The legal battle begins! Black man sues Da Ya for tens of millions of dollars in compensation, lawyer: "This part" is unconstitutional|Global News reporters Huang Gengen and Zhang Xiangyu News link: Artist Da Ya accused black man Chen Jianzhou of sexual harassment, and now a second victim has testified via PO. However, the black couple issued a statement through their lawyers, filing a civil lawsuit against Da Ya, demanding 10 million yuan in compensation and a public apology from Da Ya. Some lawyers pointed out that the Constitution grants people freedom of expression, and just asking for a public apology is unconstitutional. ; Some former prosecutors said that the entire statement was unclear and could only deceive laymen. Lawyer Li Yusheng of Fidelity Law Firm said that the Constitutional Court has issued the 111th Constitutional Court No. 2 judgment, holding that the method of restoring honor "does not include the court ordering the perpetrator to apologize", and it is unconstitutional to force an apology through the judgment. Only in line with the protection of the Constitution...