The legal battle begins! Black people sue Da Ya for tens of millions of dollars in damages. Lawyer: "This part" is unconstitutional. Lawyer Li Yusheng explains sexual harassment evidence and the issue of constitutional freedom of speech.

The legal battle begins! Black people sue Da Ya for tens of millions of dollars in compensation. Lawyer: "This part" is unconstitutional｜Global News reporters Huang Gengen and Zhang Xiangyu

News link:https://youtu.be/6iT5Ha_wqeA

Artist Daya accused black man Chen Jianzhou of sexual harassment, and now a second victim has posted a testimonial. However, the black couple issued a statement through their lawyers, filing a civil lawsuit against Da Ya, demanding 10 million yuan in compensation and a public apology from Da Ya. Some lawyers pointed out that the Constitution grants people freedom of expression, and simply demanding a public apology is unconstitutional. ; Some former prosecutors said that the entire statement was unclear and could only deceive laymen.

Lawyer Li Yusheng of Fidelity Law Firm said that the Constitutional Court has issued the 111th Constitutional Court No. 2 judgment, holding that the method of restoring honor "does not include the court ordering the perpetrator to apologize", and it is unconstitutional to force an apology through the judgment. This is in line with the Constitution's intention to protect people's freedom of speech and freedom of thought.

Fuda Law Firm
Line：https://line.me/ti/p/@fdlaw
Tel:0277093611
Facebook:https://www.facebook.com/fudalawyer
website:https://fdlaw.com.tw/
e-mail:info@fdlaw.com.tw