助理費,高虹安

Kao Hung-an has passed the initial screening! The cases of Yen Kuan-heng, Lin Tai-hua, and Lin Yi-chin allegedly defrauding assistant fees remain unresolved. Lawyer Li Yu-sheng explains the practical criteria for determining whether fraudulently obtaining assistant fees constitutes embezzlement.


Kao Hung-an has been cleared for now! The cases of Yen Kuan-heng, Lin Tai-hua, and Lin Yi-chin allegedly defrauding assistants remain unresolved.| ETtoday News reporters Liao Wei-hong and Huang Hao-zhe

News link:https://youtu.be/nBeNNYL9oCk?si=h_QJ6436Q5c8DGw0

related news:https://fdlaw.com.tw/blog/seizure/

related news:https://fdlaw.com.tw/blog/corruption-2/

related news:https://fdlaw.com.tw/blog/prosecutors-corruption/

related news:https://fdlaw.com.tw/blog/substitute-mayor/

The second trial of Hsinchu Mayor Kao Hung-an's assistant fee case saw a dramatic reversal, with one of the reasons for her acquittal being that the Legislative Yuan's reply stated that the assistant's remuneration was a form of subsidy for legislators. This has sparked curiosity about whether such a precedent can extricate other legislators also embroiled in assistant fee cases. Lawyers analyze that the key to this verdict is that Kao Hung-an did not falsely report the number of assistants. If other legislators cannot prove that the money given to their assistants was for political purposes, they may find it difficult to escape legal responsibility.

Further reading:The Anti-Corruption Ordinance imposes a maximum sentence of life imprisonment! A professional corruption lawyer teaches you how to successfully defend yourself against "civil servant crimes" | Fidelity Law Firm

Fuda Law Firm
Line:https://line.me/ti/p/@fdlaw
Tel:0277093611
Facebook:https://www.facebook.com/fudalawyer
website:https://fdlaw.com.tw/
e-mail:info@fdlaw.com.tw

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *