逃亡後如果被抓是否會被羈押

Kaohsiung Institute of Finance's chief accountant, Chang Chun-chieh, absconded after being released on bail; Chou Huan-kai was detained for allegedly assisting in the escape | Attorney Li Yu-sheng explains the legal responsibilities of escape and detention.

In the corruption case involving Kao Chin Su-mei, Chang Chun-chieh, a key defendant, absconded after being released on bail, while Chou Huan-kai was detained for allegedly assisting in the escape. Attorney Lee Yu-sheng explained the facts of the escape and the decision to detain him.

News Headline: Kaohsiung Financial Holdings Chief Accountant Chang Chun-chieh Absconds After Bail; Chou Huan-kai Detained for Assisting Escape - FTV News
Media source: Formosa TV News network
Reporter: FTV News Interview Team
News link: https://www.ftvnews.com.tw/news/detail/2026911S04M2?utm_source=youtube&utm_medium=description

News Summary

According to a report by FTV News, Chang Chun-chieh, a key defendant in the corruption case involving independent legislator Kao Chin Su-mei and former director of her parliamentary office, absconded on September 6 after being released on bail. Police investigations revealed that during his escape, he repeatedly changed his appearance, used taxis to create obstacles in the investigation, and allegedly obtained vehicles with the assistance of Chou Huan-kai. Chou Huan-kai has been detained and held incommunicado by the court on suspicion of aiding and abetting the escape. Police are continuing their investigation into whether there are other accomplices or masterminds behind the scenes.

Lawyer Li Yusheng explains

Attorney Li Yusheng stated that the legal consequences of absconding on bail are not limited to the potential for forfeiture of the bail money; the court will also reassess the defendant's flight risk and likelihood of appearing in court. If the defendant has made prior arrangements to change clothes, switch modes of transportation, or seek assistance from others to hide, these specific actions may be considered by the court as constituting an act of flight, thereby affecting the subsequent determination of compulsory measures.

Whether assisting a fugitive constitutes a crime depends on whether the assister was aware that the fugitive was evading legal proceedings, and on the specific nature of the assistance provided, such as providing vehicles, communication, or shelter. The court will determine this on a case-by-case basis.Determination of detention in criminal casesThe investigation will also take into account whether there is a risk of escape, destruction of evidence, or collusion with accomplices and witnesses, as well as the degree of suspicion of the crime and the progress of the case; the facts stated in the news reports should still be based on the investigation by the police and prosecutors and the rulings of the court.


Fuda Law Firm
Address: 17th Floor, No. 180, Section 2, Dunhua South Road, Da'an District, Taipei Taiwan 106
Tel:02-7709-3611
Line:@fdlaw
Facebook:FDLAW
website:https://fdlaw.com.tw/
e-mail:info@fdlaw.com.tw

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *