Telephone
02-77093611
Line
@fdlaw
address
17th Floor, No. 180, Section 2, Dunhua South Road, Da'an District, Taipei City
Telephone
02-77093611
Line
@fdlaw
address
17th Floor, No. 180, Section 2, Dunhua South Road, Da'an District, Taipei City

When Taiwanese companies engage in international trade and disputes arise, the first question they most frequently ask is: "The other party is located overseas, so where do I file a complaint?"
However, the real issues that need to be addressed in cross-border business disputes are usually not just the courts of which country.
For example:
Or conversely: a foreign company has already filed a lawsuit against a Taiwanese company in Taiwan.
These cases typically involve:
And the final execution of the judgment.
Therefore, the real first step is not: "Quickly send a lawyer's letter."
Instead, answer four questions first:Where should it be processed?Which country's laws apply?Where is the evidence?Even if you win the case, where will the judgment be enforced?
The same international transaction may involve:
US contract template.
So even if on the surface it's just: "Payment owed for goods"
Before legal proceedings actually begin, it is still necessary to confirm: who are the true parties to the contract?
Who placed the order?
Who pays?
Who will receive the goods?
Who issued the invoice?
Where should the goods be delivered?
Which country's law should be used in the contract?
Which court should I write about?
Is there an arbitration clause?
Where are the other party's main assets located?
Cross-border cases cannot rely solely on a single invoice to determine the entire legal strategy.
Such cases can be handled byCorporate Business and Cross-border Commercial Dispute LawyerIntegrate transaction, procedure and execution assessments.
Currently handling cases on behalf of [the client].
Fidelity Law Firm is currently representing an Italian company in a civil lawsuit filed against a Taiwanese company in a Taiwanese court regarding a dispute over payment for goods arising from an international trade transaction.
The case:
Attorney Li Yusheng acted as the litigation representative for the foreign company.
The case is still under trial in court.
This case presents practical experience in handling the case, rather than the final judgment.
Fidelity Law Firm is actually handling cases for foreign companies:
And international debt claims.

"Fidelity Law Firm is currently representing foreign companies in international debt civil litigation in Taiwanese courts. The parties, case number, and other identifying information in the ruling have been obscured; the case is still under review, and this image does not represent the final judgment."
This case is still under trial. It only presents practical experience in handling the case and does not represent or guarantee any judgment outcome.
There is no single answer that applies to all cases.
First, we need to check whether the contract stipulates the court.
For example, a contract might state:
Courts in other countries.
It could also be not a court at all, but rather: international arbitration.
If the contract does not explicitly stipulate this, further action is required:
Analysis of procedural laws in various countries to determine jurisdiction.
But "has jurisdiction"
That's not the only problem.
For example, a Taiwanese court might have the opportunity to hear the case, but all of the other party's assets are in Europe.
Even if Taiwan wins the case, it may still need to go to a foreign country for recognition and enforcement.
Therefore, when choosing a venue for litigation, the following should also be considered:Where can I file a lawsuit?and:Where is the money to carry out this?
Which court or arbitration body will hear the case?
Which country's laws determine contractual rights and obligations?
This is one of the most common misunderstandings about international contracts.
The contract may stipulate: "This contract shall be governed by English law."
However, it also states: "The Taipei District Court of Taiwan has jurisdiction."
These are not necessarily contradictory.
Because: the applicable law answers which country's law determines the rights and obligations under a contract.
The answer to "jurisdiction" is: which court or arbitration body hears the case.
The two issues must be addressed separately.
According to Taiwan'sLaw on the Application of Law in Foreign-related Civil CasesArticle 20
In principle, the obligations arising from contracts should respect the parties' intent regarding the applicable law.
If no effective alternative is found, then the principle of closest relationship should be used for further judgment.
Therefore, when disputes arise in international contracts, the first thing to do is to identify the Governing Law Clause and the Jurisdiction/Arbitration Clause.
If the specific case applies under Taiwanese law, the performance of the contract and the claim for payment shall still be governed by law.civil lawDetermine the specific terms of the transaction.
If the actual jurisdiction lies with a foreign court, Taiwanese lawyers cannot obtain the right to practice law in that country.
Therefore, the most professional way to handle cross-border litigation is not to pretend: "Taiwanese lawyers can appear in courts of any country."
Instead, it was handled by Fidelity Law Firm:Taiwan Duan Zhuzhi Legal Teamassist:
Assist the head office or management in understanding different litigation strategies.
When it is truly necessary to appear in a foreign court or submit procedural documents, the matter shall be handled by a lawyer qualified locally, in accordance with the regulations of that country.
This can prevent Taiwanese companies from directly:
All the Chinese company documents were handed over to foreign lawyers, but no one first sorted out the real core of the case.
At least including:
That doesn't mean it's impossible.
International trade is often a long-term endeavor.
The transaction may be conducted by:
Payments were made repeatedly.
Therefore, even if there is no document titled "International Sales Agreement"...
The official document still needs to include:
The payments are linked together.
What really needs to be proven is: what exactly the two parties agreed upon, and whether the transaction has been fulfilled.
Don't just reply, "There's nothing wrong with our product."
Should be retained immediately:
And whether the other party continues to use or resell the product.
The real core of many payment disputes is not: "Whether there are defects or not".
The question is: when should it be raised?
How is acceptance carried out as stipulated in the contract?
Is the defect significant?
Was there an opportunity to make corrections?
Can the damage caused by defects be used to offset the entire payment for the goods?
International trade contracts often include terms such as EX, W, FOB, CI, FDA, PD, DP, etc.
Incoterms can help clarify:
Partial cost allocation.
However, this does not mean that writing FOB automatically means:
All court jurisdiction issues have been resolved.
Incoterms are only one part of the transaction structure.
The configuration details before signing the contract can be consulted together.Risks associated with overseas orders and international trade contracts.
A lawyer's letter is typically suitable for:
A settlement window has been proposed.
However, the lawyer's letter is not the purpose itself.
If the other party has already:
Deliberately delaying and sending letters back and forth is not necessarily the best strategy.
At this point, a direct assessment may be necessary:
Or other preservation procedures.
Because winning a lawsuit and actually receiving the money are two different things.
If the overseas debtor does not:
Other executable assets may have limited commercial value if a judgment is obtained.
Therefore, cross-border claims should also consider:
implement.
Instead of asking, "Does the other party have any assets?" only after the lawsuit is over.
It depends on the jurisdiction and local procedural laws.
If it's a Taiwanese procedure, the creditor must comply with our country's...Civil Procedure LawWhen the requirements are met,
It is possible to assess a false seizure.
But the court will review:
And related legal requirements, and may involve guarantees.
No: The court will not necessarily freeze assets as long as the other party owes money.
If the assets are located overseas, a separate assessment of the preservation measures will be required in accordance with local laws and by a local lawyer.
The procedure preparation can also be referenced.Corporate Commercial Litigation, Presumptive Seizure and Evidence Strategy.
It cannot be preset.
Each country has its own regulations regarding the recognition and enforcement of foreign court judgments.
If: the Taiwanese company wins the case in Taiwan, but the debtor's main assets are overseas, the next step may need to be in the country where the assets are located:
Then it will be implemented locally.
Therefore, when signing a contract, one should consider: where will the future judgment be enforced?
It cannot be executed directly.
According to Article 402 of the Civil Procedure Law of Taiwan, the validity of a foreign court's judgment in Taiwan must still comply with the provisions of Taiwan law.
For example, it may involve:
And factors such as mutual recognition.
according toEnforcement Law,
If a foreign court judgment is to be enforced in Taiwan, it must obtain permission from a Taiwanese court to enforce it in accordance with the law.
Therefore, if a foreign company has already obtained a judgment overseas, but the debtor's assets are in Taiwan, a "Taiwan recognition + enforcement procedure" should still be designed first.
According to Article 402 of the Code of Civil Procedure, the recognition of a foreign court's judgment in Taiwan must meet relevant legal requirements; according to Article 4-1 of the Enforcement Act, an application for enforcement of the judgment in Taiwan still requires permission from a Taiwanese court to enforce the judgment.
For example, a sentence like: "Payment shall be made within 60 days after delivery."
It appears to be just a payment condition.
However, the actual case still needs to be clarified: how exactly is delivery defined?
Is it to hand it over to the carrier?
Arrival at port?
Customs clearance?
Delivered to the buyer's warehouse?
Or is the acceptance process complete?
If the contract contains:
All payment terms must be read together.
Therefore, reviewing English contracts is never just about translating English into Chinese.
Contract review includesEnglish contract review and cross-border contract termsOverall interpretation.
Cross-border cases are not limited to Taiwanese companies pursuing foreign companies.
It could also be that a foreign company seeks compensation from a Taiwanese company.
At this point, Taiwanese companies need to confirm:
Is it possible for foreign judgments to be enforced in Taiwan in the future?
It cannot be because: "I am in Taiwan."
They completely ignore overseas court documents.
Missing the deadline for responding to a lawsuit could make the case more difficult to resolve later.
Our firm is currently representing an Italian company in a Taiwanese court to recover international transaction payments from a Taiwanese company.
These types of cases are handled by Fidelity Law Firm:
International debt recovery.
Therefore, when Taiwanese companies find themselves in the opposite position and prepare to seek recourse from overseas companies, we can better understand their perspectives from both sides:
And how Taiwanese lawyers collaborate with overseas lawyers.
This case is still under trial and does not represent or predict any final judgment.
Attorney Li Yusheng has approximately 20 years of legal practice experience and has a long history of handling:
Civil and commercial litigation.
Fidelity Law Firm has a long history of serving foreign companies and multinational corporations, and has experience assisting hundreds of foreign companies with their legal matters in Taiwan, including:
and litigation.
The key to cross-border business cases is not translating documents into English.
Instead, let:
The court or arbitration body sees the same complete set of facts and evidence in the case.
Depend onLawyer Li YushengCombinationCorporate legal counsel and international business legal servicesExperience in handling legal collaborations between the Taiwan team and overseas teams.
The jurisdiction of a Taiwanese court must be determined based on the contractual jurisdiction clause, the parties involved, the performance relationship, and relevant procedural laws. It cannot be assumed that a Taiwanese court necessarily has jurisdiction simply because the plaintiff is a Taiwanese company.
Fidelity Law Firm can serve as the lead legal team in Taiwan, handling contracts, evidence, legal issues, and litigation strategies, and assisting with collaborations with local foreign lawyers. However, actual practice and appearances in foreign courts must still comply with the legal qualification regulations of that country.
Applicable law and court jurisdiction are different issues. In some cases, Taiwanese courts may hear the case but apply foreign law; in such cases, the rules of contract and international law should still be applied.
The absence of a formal master contract does not necessarily preclude the assertion of rights. It is still essential to examine quotations, orders, confirmations, invoices, delivery records, payments, and all other correspondence between the parties to reconstruct a complete transaction.
Not necessarily. It's necessary to confirm the contract's acceptance procedures, the details of the defects, the notification time, the product's usage, and whether the damage and set-off are legal.
Many cases are suitable for issuing a formal demand first, but if the other party is already in financial crisis or at risk of asset transfer, preservation or litigation should be assessed at the same time, and the lawyer's letter should not be used as an indefinite delay.
In principle, it is still necessary to confirm the requirements for recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments in accordance with Taiwan's Code of Civil Procedure and Enforcement Act.
It's not just about determining who breached the contract, but about putting jurisdiction, applicable law, evidence, the other party's assets, and the place of final enforcement into the same strategy.