Telephone
02-77093611
Line
@fdlaw
address
17th Floor, No. 180, Section 2, Dunhua South Road, Da'an District, Taipei City
Telephone
02-77093611
Line
@fdlaw
address
17th Floor, No. 180, Section 2, Dunhua South Road, Da'an District, Taipei City

Terrible! Gao Hongan's corruption case was suspended and the Constitutional Court refused to accept the application for constitutional interpretation. Despite the lawsuit, Gao Hongan is still striving for re-election in 2026. │ Sanli News reporter Hou Caihong Gao Guanxuan
News link:https://youtu.be/PO7c8vqohAU?si=8_bai6zcGHw4Xag-
related news:https://fdlaw.com.tw/blog/seizure/
related news:https://fdlaw.com.tw/blog/corruption-2/
related news:https://fdlaw.com.tw/blog/prosecutors-corruption/
related news:https://fdlaw.com.tw/blog/substitute-mayor/
Attorney Li Yusheng of Fidelity Law Offices said that since the provisions on assistant fees in this case may be quite clear and do not reach the level of violating the Constitution, the Constitutional Court decided not to accept the case at a relatively fast speed. The High Court needs to continue to hear the case and may have a result by the end of the year. Gao Hongan needs to put forward a more favorable defense, such as not misappropriating the assistant fees for personal use, or using the large reservoir theory to argue that there was no intention to embezzle the assistant fees. If there is no more favorable defense, the probability of maintaining the guilty verdict of embezzlement is higher.
Fuda Law Firm
Line:https://line.me/ti/p/@fdlaw
Tel:0277093611
Facebook:https://www.facebook.com/fudalawyer
website:https://fdlaw.com.tw/
e-mail:info@fdlaw.com.tw
It is recommended to first organize your job authority, decision-making process, transaction records, financial flow and meeting materials, and consult a lawyer before being questioned by the Investigation Bureau, the Independent Commission Against Corruption, or the prosecutor's office.
The focus is usually on whether the law is violated, whether there is a quid pro quo relationship, whether there is an illegal benefit, and whether the perpetrator was aware that the act was illegal.
An assessment can be made, but it depends on the suspicion of the suspect, the state of the evidence, the risk of escape or collusion, and the alternative measures that can be proposed.