The final chapter of the debate at the Jinghua City Police Department! Ko Wen-je again claims "I had no knowledge"; Attorney Liu Yi-ling explains strategies for handling criminal trial proceedings and litigation defense.

The final chapter of the debate in Jinghua City! Ko Wen-je again claims "I have no knowledge" │ Mirror News reporters Chang Ching-han and Hu Ke-chiang

News link:https://youtu.be/d815WxJq4n8?si=NBQivALUuPgCT0uW

The Taipei District Court's trial of the Core Pacific City case has entered its final stage. Today (December 24th) is also the last time that Taiwan People's Party Chairman Ko Wen-je will defend himself in court. He reiterated that he knew nothing about the Core Pacific City case. Ying Hsiao-wei, on the other hand, broke down in tears when she got emotional and even suggested that the judge use a guillotine to behead prosecutor Lin Chun-yen.

Attorney Liu Yiling of Fidelity Law Firm stated that the judge will consider the substantive evidence rather than the process of Ko Wen-je's criminal act. In the final statement during the criminal trial, the defendant should present substantive arguments such as the lack of criminal liability or positive evidence. However, Ko Wen-je used this opportunity to criticize the prosecutor and even the president. These comments are irrelevant to the facts of the case and will not be considered by the judge. Such remarks are of no help to the trial.

Fuda Law Firm
Line：https://line.me/ti/p/@fdlaw
Tel:0277093611
Facebook:https://www.facebook.com/fudalawyer
website:https://fdlaw.com.tw/
e-mail:info@fdlaw.com.tw