破壞電子腳鐐後逃亡,如果被抓羈押機率大增

Zhang Junjie Sabotages Electronic Bracelet and Flees | Attorney Xu Wanwei Explains the Crime of Damaging Property Under the Control of a Public Official and the Probability of Detention After Fleeing

News Headline:Zhang Junjie's escape after damaging an electronic bracelet creates a 12-hour window of opportunity, posing a challenge to his capture | # Mirror News
Media Source:Mirror News
reporter:Huang Yuting and Hu Keqiang
News link:https://youtu.be/H_kwfkIlNJE?si=mTk_TL9u5Uf1KdpX

News Summary

According to Mirror News, Chang Chun-chieh, former assistant to independent legislator Kao Chin Su-mei, has been released on bail of NT$10 million in a corruption case, but is subject to restrictions on leaving the country, going to sea, staying at home, and being monitored by an electronic bracelet. The report states that Chang went missing after leaving home on the morning of September 6th, and the monitoring system only issued a low battery warning that evening. Police found the damaged and discarded electronic bracelet in Daan Forest Park early the following morning. The Taipei District Court has issued an arrest warrant and filed charges against him for damage to official business; however, the actual criminal liability is still pending investigation by prosecutors and the court.

Lawyer Xu Wanwei explains

Attorney Xu Wanwei stated that electronic bracelets are devices delivered to monitored individuals for use in court-mandated technological surveillance. If a person intentionally cuts, damages, or discards the bracelet, rendering it inoperable, it may constitute the crime of destroying or damaging property under the official control of a public official or entrusted to a third party under Article 138 of the Criminal Law, with a statutory penalty of up to five years imprisonment. Whether a crime has been committed depends on evidence such as ownership and custody of the device, the actual manner of damage, the perpetrator's intent, and the surveillance records.Criminal casesIn court, ordering defendants to undergo monitoring with technological equipment is an important measure to prevent escape; if the defendant damages the equipment and flees, it may also become an important factor for the court to reassess the necessity of detention and other compulsory measures.


Fuda Law Firm
Address: 17th Floor, No. 180, Section 2, Dunhua South Road, Da'an District, Taipei Taiwan 106
Tel:02-7709-3611
Line:@fdlaw
Facebook:FDLAW
website:https://fdlaw.com.tw/
e-mail:info@fdlaw.com.tw

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *