Reversal of detention based on old evidence and evidence of non-lawyers in the case: Testimony shows that Ke was aware of the situation | CTV News Lawyer Li Yusheng explained the detention court’s restrictions on reviewing documents and the defense strategy of Ke Wenzhe’s lawyer

The prosecutor used old documents to reverse the detention of the lawyer who was not involved in the case: Testimony showed that Ke had known knowledge｜China Television News│ Reporter Sun Yuli

News link:https://youtu.be/HHD69woFnZ4?si=B9yTniMcT0NOGNuu

People's Party Chairman Ko Wenzhe was ordered by the Taipei District Court to be detained without permission. Although the prosecutors carefully searched for evidence during the process, the court asked the judge not to consider new evidence in order to prevent Ko Wenzhe from being "surprised" in court. However, the final result , Ke Wenzhe was still taken into custody. The lawyer analyzed the reasons for the ruling because the witness testimony was enough to show that Ke Wenzhe was not ignorant.

Lawyer Li Yusheng of Fidelity Law Firm said that even if the prosecutor requests to restrict the review of the file, the part that the prosecutor will later restrict cannot be cited in the detention court. In other words, this can protect the legal defense rights of Ke Wenzhe and his lawyer. , demanding equal weapons on both sides. Restrictions on access to documents generally mean that the defendant's defender is not allowed to see a specific part of the evidence. However, in this case, the judge allowed the defendant's defender to view all the evidence, but it cannot be photocopied and can only be recorded by hand.

Fuda Law Firm
Line：https://line.me/ti/p/@fdlaw
Tel:0277093611
Facebook:https://www.facebook.com/fudalawyer
website:https://fdlaw.com.tw/
e-mail:info@fdlaw.com.tw