Telephone
02-77093611
Line
@fdlaw
address
17th Floor, No. 180, Section 2, Dunhua South Road, Da'an District, Taipei City
Telephone
02-77093611
Line
@fdlaw
address
17th Floor, No. 180, Section 2, Dunhua South Road, Da'an District, Taipei City

Evidence of bribery in Ke Wenzhe's flash drive? Recorded "1500 Shen Qingjing"│TVBS News Reporters Guo Ying and Lin Longshi
News link:https://youtu.be/vu8U5S50YUY?si=Aeu-reAYJLyJ-_jc
The weekly reported that one of the flash drives seized by the prosecutors was suspected of recording evidence of money collection, with "1,500 Shen Qingjing" written on it. Although it has not been confirmed whether it is related to money, the outside world has questioned whether the content that cannot be announced during the investigation will be. Either the protest notice from the Beijing Procuratorate or the High Court ruling leaked out.
Lawyer Li Yusheng of Fidelity Law Firm said that from the beginning when the prosecutors went to Ke Wenzhe's home to search, relevant prosecutors had the opportunity to come into contact with evidence related to corruption crimes. After that, the case was turned into a file and handed over to the District Attorney's Office. Relevant administrative personnel and prosecutors will see the content, and the detention court judge, second instance judge, second detention court judge and relevant clerks will all have access to the documentary materials.
Fuda Law Firm
Line:https://line.me/ti/p/@fdlaw
Tel:0277093611
Facebook:https://www.facebook.com/fudalawyer
website:https://fdlaw.com.tw/
e-mail:info@fdlaw.com.tw
It is recommended to first organize your job authority, decision-making process, transaction records, financial flow and meeting materials, and consult a lawyer before being questioned by the Investigation Bureau, the Independent Commission Against Corruption, or the prosecutor's office.
The focus is usually on whether the law is violated, whether there is a quid pro quo relationship, whether there is an illegal benefit, and whether the perpetrator was aware that the act was illegal.
An assessment can be made, but it depends on the suspicion of the suspect, the state of the evidence, the risk of escape or collusion, and the alternative measures that can be proposed.