國民法官判處死刑,上訴有機會撤銷改判嗎?

Triple family annihilation case: "Death sentence still handed down on appeal!" Lawyer Li Yusheng explains the criteria for a national judge to impose the death penalty and whether an appeal could overturn the death sentence.

The death sentence in the second trial of the triple family annihilation case: How should we view the death sentence, the appeal, and the rights of the victims' families?

News Headline:A triple family annihilation case has resulted in a death sentence in the second trial! The appeal has been rejected.

Media Source:Mirror News

reporter:Huang Lingxuan

News link:https://youtu.be/fPSOZmLz3r4?si=KKJxQySHGfuLkzhf

When a death sentence is upheld on appeal in a major criminal case, public attention is focused not only on the verdict, but also on how the court determines the sentence, whether the defendant can appeal, and how the victim's family can protect their rights in both criminal proceedings and civil claims.

News Summary

According to news reports, the second instance verdict in the New Taipei City Sanchong family annihilation case has been announced. The defendant, Zhang Hongyi, was sentenced to death in the first instance for murdering his wife, mother-in-law, and young stepson. He appealed, but the High Court upheld the death sentence in the second instance and rejected the appeal.

These types of cases involve serious infringements on life and other legal interests. When sentencing, the court usually takes into account the criminal motive, means, number of victims, post-crime attitude, whether there is a possibility of rehabilitation, and the impact on the victims' families and social order.

Lawyer Li Yusheng explains

Li Yusheng, a lawyer at Fidelity Law Firm, stated that Article 271 of the Criminal Law stipulates that murder can be punished with the death penalty, life imprisonment, or imprisonment for a term of not less than ten years. The death penalty is the most severe punishment, and the court will not automatically impose the death penalty simply because the case is serious. Instead, it must specifically explain why other penalties are deemed insufficient to assess the circumstances of the crime in this particular case.

The second instance court's rejection of the appeal and upholding of the death sentence indicates that the second instance court found no grounds for overturning or modifying the first instance's findings of fact and sentencing. However, whether a major criminal case is finalized after the second instance trial still depends on whether the defendant files a third instance appeal in accordance with the law, and the subsequent outcome of the Supreme Court's hearing.

Attorney Li Yusheng also reminded that in addition to paying attention to the criminal verdict, the families of victims should also be aware of procedures such as civil damages, civil suits attached to criminal cases, and protection and compensation for crime victims. While criminal verdicts deal with the state's penal power, families still need to pursue claims for medical treatment, funeral expenses, support payments, or mental anguish compensation through civil procedures or relevant systems.

Legal Disputes and Practical Reminders

A death sentence in the first or second instance does not necessarily mean the entire case is settled.

Even if the death sentence is upheld in the second instance, the defendant may still seek redress in a third instance. Whether the case is final depends on subsequent court proceedings and judgment.

II. Death penalty sentencing should consider the circumstances of the crime and the possibility of rehabilitation.

Courts typically consider factors such as the means of the crime, the number of victims, the offender's attitude after the crime, the risk of recidivism, the possibility of rehabilitation, and the degree of harm to social interests; they cannot rely on a single factor for judgment.

Third, the victim's family can simultaneously assess their civil claims for compensation.

A criminal judgment does not automatically provide for full compensation. The family may assess the damages in an adjunct civil suit or file a separate civil lawsuit to claim funeral expenses, support payments, and emotional distress damages.

IV. Pay attention to procedural time limits in major cases.

Whether it's an appeal, an incidental civil suit, a claim for damages, or a compensation application, there may be time limits. Family members should gather the judgment, complaint, expense receipts, and kinship documents as early as possible.

FAQ

Q1. After the death sentence was upheld in the second instance, was the case considered closed?

Not necessarily. Even after the second instance judgment, the defendant may still file a third appeal according to law. Whether it's certain depends on whether there is a subsequent appeal and the Supreme Court's decision.

Q2. Is the death penalty always imposed for murder?

Not necessarily. Article 271 of the Criminal Law stipulates that murder is punishable by death, life imprisonment, or imprisonment for a term of ten years or more. The court will determine the sentence based on factors such as the circumstances of the crime, the number of victims, the offender's attitude after the crime, and the possibility of rehabilitation.

Q3. Can the victim's family members claim compensation?

Yes. The family can assess the possibility of filing a civil suit attached to the criminal case or separately file a civil lawsuit for damages, requesting funeral expenses, support payments, and compensation for emotional distress, but they still need to provide relevant evidence.

Q4. What should the victim's family prepare in advance during a major criminal case?

It is recommended to compile the indictment, judgment, medical and funeral expense receipts, proof of kinship, support records, and records related to emotional distress, and then have a lawyer assess the criminal proceedings and compensation strategy.

Lawyer's Reminder

The harm caused to families by serious criminal cases often does not end immediately after the first and second instance judgments. In addition to focusing on whether criminal liability and judgments are finalized, civil claims, protection of crime victims, compensation applications, and notification of subsequent procedures should also be addressed simultaneously.

If you or your family members encounter major criminal cases, victim claims, criminal incidental civil lawsuits, or issues related to post-judgment procedures, it is recommended that you organize your materials and consult a lawyer as soon as possible to avoid missing deadlines or failing to fully assert your rights.

Fuda Law Firm

If you encounter a major criminal case, victim rights, criminal incidental civil claims, or damages, it is recommended that you first organize the judgment, indictment, expense receipts, and family information, and then have a lawyer assist in assessing subsequent strategies.

Line:https://line.me/ti/p/@fdlaw

Tel:0277093611

Facebook:https://www.facebook.com/fudalawyer

website:https://fdlaw.com.tw/

e-mail:info@fdlaw.com.tw

References:Mirror News YouTube Video,Article 271 of the Criminal Law,Article 57 of the Criminal Law,Article 487 of the Criminal Procedure Law,Law on the Protection of the Rights and Interests of Crime Victims

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *