Telephone
02-77093611
Line
@fdlaw
address
17th Floor, No. 180, Section 2, Dunhua South Road, Da'an District, Taipei City
Telephone
02-77093611
Line
@fdlaw
address
17th Floor, No. 180, Section 2, Dunhua South Road, Da'an District, Taipei City

Ke Wenzhe is again involved in the crime of unknown source of property, and the Beijing Procuratorate is investigating the "case written by others"│FTV News Reporter Chen Yanlin
News link:https://youtu.be/ATQfDWlFQ2o?si=RKDGXRd2KY0wMaGK
Former People’s Party Chairman Ke Wenzhe was just indicted for the Beijing Capital Case and the Political Donation Case and specifically requested a prison sentence of 28.5 years. To this day, he is still debating with the prosecutors whether to take him into custody. However, the Beijing Prosecutor's Office has separately investigated Ke Wenzhe and former deputy mayor Peng Zhensheng for allegedly having unclear sources of huge sums of money and committing crimes involving unclear sources of property belonging to public servants. Lawyer Li Yusheng from Fidelity Law Firm said that the court ruled for the second time that although Ke Wenzhe and others were still allowed to post bail, Cai Biru and three others immediately overturned the statements they made during the investigation as soon as they posted bail. Obviously, Ke Wenzhe still has some concerns about relevant people. The high substantive influence does not rule out the possibility of another collusion. Therefore, when hearing this protest, the High Court took the possibility of collusion into consideration and re-evaluated it, so it finally granted a detention ruling.
Fuda Law Firm
Line:https://line.me/ti/p/@fdlaw
Tel:0277093611
Facebook:https://www.facebook.com/fudalawyer
website:https://fdlaw.com.tw/
e-mail:info@fdlaw.com.tw
It is recommended to first organize your job authority, decision-making process, transaction records, financial flow and meeting materials, and consult a lawyer before being questioned by the Investigation Bureau, the Independent Commission Against Corruption, or the prosecutor's office.
The focus is usually on whether the law is violated, whether there is a quid pro quo relationship, whether there is an illegal benefit, and whether the perpetrator was aware that the act was illegal.
An assessment can be made, but it depends on the suspicion of the suspect, the state of the evidence, the risk of escape or collusion, and the alternative measures that can be proposed.