Telephone
02-77093611

Line
@fdlaw

address
17th Floor, No. 180, Section 2, Dunhua South Road, Da'an District, Taipei City

侵害商標,侵害著作權

The pop-up store was not authorized. JISOO issued a statement saying that the prices of goods at the Taipei event were double those at the overseas event. The organizer emphasized that all items were legally authorized. Does this infringe on trademarks or copyrights?

JISOO Company Statement: Unauthorized Pop-up Store, Taipei Event Priced at Double the Overseas Price; Organizer Emphasizes Legal Authorization | SET News Reporters Lin Chin-yu and Huang Cheng-chieh. News Link: Attorney Li Yu-sheng of Fidelity Law Firm stated that if the Taiwanese organizer uses the official company's artist name or image without official authorization, it may infringe upon the official company's reputation and rights, and could constitute trademark infringement or even copyright infringement for profit, punishable by imprisonment for six to five years, a fine of NT$200,000 to NT$2 million, and civil liability. Consumers may also face the risk of purchasing counterfeit goods and being unable to return or exchange them, resulting in losses. Line online consultation hotline. Legal consultation with Fidelity Law Firm…

毒品,網路販毒

National Taiwan University top student Lin Ruixiang was sentenced to 30 years in prison by a US court for selling drugs online. Attorney Li Yusheng explains the criminal liability for online drug trafficking and the scope of Taiwan's criminal jurisdiction.

National Taiwan University (NTU) top student Lin Ruixiang was sentenced to 30 years in prison by a US court for operating a dark web platform to traffic drugs. He was arrested in the US in 2024 and has now been sentenced to 30 years in prison by a federal court. During the trial, he pleaded guilty in court and wrote a letter to the judge pleading for leniency, but the judge stated during sentencing that this was the most serious drug crime he had committed in his 27-year judicial career! Lin Ruixiang is also wanted by Taiwanese prosecutors, and his NT$60 million mansion in Tianmu, as well as money transferred to his family, have been seized. Even after serving his sentence in the US, he will still face prosecution in Taiwan. Attorney Li Yusheng of Fidelity Law Firm stated that Taiwanese man Lin Ruixiang was convicted of drug distribution by a federal court in New York…

趁機性交罪,強製性交罪

A wanted criminal was sentenced to 5 years and 2 months for sexually assaulting an intoxicated Hong Kong woman in the lobby of Taipei Main Station. A criminal lawyer from Fidelity Law Firm explains the legal provisions and criminal liability for the crimes of forced sexual intercourse and sexual exploitation.

News and Video Source: Case Background and Legal Controversy: Wanted Man Sentenced to 5 Years and 2 Months for Sexually Assaulting Intoxicated Hong Kong Woman in Taipei Main Station Hall | TTV News Reporter Tsai Chang-yu A sexual assault occurred at Taipei Main Station on October 9th last year. Wanted man Chiu Sheng-ming sexually assaulted an intoxicated Hong Kong female tourist in the station hall for 10 minutes without anyone intervening. When apprehended, the suspect claimed he was intoxicated and acted impulsively, attempting to evade responsibility. The Taipei District Court sentenced him to 5 years and 2 months imprisonment for the crime of sexual assault while intoxicated. The case is still appealable. A criminal lawyer from Fidelity Law Firm stated that the suspect sexually assaulted the victim while she was intoxicated, violating the crime of sexual assault while intoxicated, which carries a statutory penalty of three to ten years imprisonment. The judge sentenced the defendant to 5 years and 2 months imprisonment…

侵入住宅,竊盜,加重竊盜罪

A food delivery driver broke into a female tenant's apartment and ransacked her shoe cabinet, terrifying her as she checked the security camera footage. The delivery driver has been suspended, and the e-commerce company has apologized and offered compensation. Does this constitute trespassing and theft?

A delivery driver broke into a shared apartment and ransacked the shoe cabinet; the female tenant was terrified after checking the security camera footage! The delivery driver has been suspended; the e-commerce company has apologized and offered compensation. | Sanlih News reporters You Tao, Zhang Haoyi, and Li Shengfeng. News Link: Lawyer Li Yusheng of Fuda Law Firm stated that if the hallway of the shared apartment has a locked door, the delivery driver's unauthorized entry could raise suspicion of trespassing. Furthermore, if the delivery driver was not simply looking for a place to store goods but searching for valuables, there could be suspicion of theft. If a crime is ultimately committed, it could constitute attempted aggravated trespassing, with a statutory penalty of imprisonment for six months to five years and a fine of up to NT$500,000. Line online consultation phone number. Legal consultation at Fuda Law Firm…

圖利罪,圖利罪答辯,行政疏失

Sentenced to 5 years for alleged favoritism? How did Fidelity's legal team help a public official secure a "non-prosecution" sanction? (Real case analysis)

Last Updated: November 5, 2025 | Author: Attorney Li Yusheng (Lead Attorney at Fidelity Law Firm / Guest Legal Commentator for Political Talk Shows) Foreword: That summons almost ruined his 20-year public service career. "Attorney, I really didn't take any money. I just wanted to finish the project quickly..." This was the first thing Section Chief Zhang (pseudonym) said to us, trembling, when he first came to Fidelity Law Firm. Section Chief Zhang is a senior civil servant who has served in the public works sector for over 20 years. Worried that the project would be delayed due to the typhoon season and cause flooding, he verbally agreed to the contractor changing the construction methods without completing the design change procedure. Although the project was completed on schedule, the contractor saved some costs. Section Chief Zhang was subsequently summoned by the investigative authorities for allegedly violating Article 6 of the Anti-Corruption Act, "profiteering." This is a classic tragedy: acting with public interest in mind, yet inadvertently stepping into the net of the law…

貪污治罪條例的圖利罪跟政府採購法

Procurement work leading to jail time? Three major pitfalls of the "Government Procurement Law" that could inadvertently constitute "profiteering"! A legal self-protection guide for civil servants.

Last Updated: November 1, 2025 | Author: Attorney Li Yusheng (Focusing Attorney at Fidelity Law Firm / Guest Legal Commentator for Political Talk Shows) Foreword: The Dilemma of Procurement Personnel: Doing Well is Duty, Making Mistakes is "Profiteering"? In the civil service system, procurement positions are often considered "high-risk, dead-end jobs." Procurement personnel not only need to be familiar with the complex "Government Procurement Law," but also have to face pressure from suppliers and demands from superiors. Most frighteningly, a careless procedural flaw may not just result in administrative penalties, but directly escalate to "profiteering" under the "Anti-Corruption Act." Many civil servants summoned by prosecutors often cry foul: "I didn't take a single penny from the supplier; I was just rushing to meet deadlines!" But Fidelity Law Firm must seriously remind you: profiteering does not require receiving money. As long as you violate procurement regulations and allow the supplier to profit, you have already stepped into the deep waters of the law. I. Why does violating the "Government Procurement Law" become "profiteering"...