特留分,遺囑,應繼分

Cao Xiping passed away suddenly; autopsy revealed his godson only received "verbal authorization" and was unable to claim the body. Lawyer Xu Wanwei explains relevant provisions of civil law regarding inheritance, wills, and reserved portions.

Veteran entertainer Cao Xiping passed away suddenly at home late last night (December 29). This afternoon (December 30), prosecutors and forensic doctors began the autopsy. The first person to discover the body was Cao Xiping's godson. When he appeared, he responded that he would handle the funeral arrangements first. But how? Because he is not a relative, even though everyone knows the deceased is Cao Xiping, he was initially considered an unidentified corpse, and his body could not be claimed. Lawyer Xu Wanwei of Fuda Law Firm stated that although Cao Xiping said he wanted all his property to go to his godson, if he wanted to arrange his estate before his death, it had to be done through a will. Without a will, his godson cannot inherit the estate…

國民法官,二審

Drug-impaired driving that killed a police officer: The first trial, which lasted 18 and a half years, was overturned and remanded to the New Taipei District Court for retrial. Lawyer Li Yusheng explains the provisions of the National Judges Act regarding the repeal of first-instance judgments in the second instance.

A drug-impaired police officer killed in a fatal accident was sentenced to 18.5 years in prison in the first instance, but the case was remanded for retrial in the New Taipei District Court. The case was remanded for retrial in the New Taipei District Court. The New Taipei District Court sentenced the suspect, Huang Guowei, to 18.5 years in prison in the first instance. On the 30th, the High Court announced its second-instance verdict, finding that the first-instance People's Court had made a procedural error by using the term "two aggravated offenses" in its evaluation. The original verdict was overturned and the case remanded for retrial, marking the first such case since the implementation of the People's Court Act. The lawyer representing Huang Weizhen's family expressed surprise at the outcome and stated that they would discuss the next steps with the family. Lawyer Li Yusheng of Fidelity Law Firm stated that the second-instance judge considered whether the charge of endangering public safety or drug-impaired driving should be applied…

社維法,擾亂秩序,徐菀蔚律師

A man in a suit yelled and forced a pregnant woman to give up her seat! A woman stormed into a hotel VIP room shouting, "I'm the owner!" Lawyer Hsu Wan-wei explains the elements and penalties for disrupting public order under the Social Order Maintenance Act.

A man in a suit yelled and forced a pregnant woman to give up her seat! A woman stormed into a hotel VIP lounge, claiming to be the boss! | CTV News reporters Chen Guanyu and Liao Yujie News Link: Yesterday afternoon (29th) on the Taipei Metro Wenhu Line, a man suddenly yelled and forced a pregnant woman to give up her priority seat, startling surrounding passengers. Fortunately, security guards immediately removed him from the train after the stop. Separately, at the Taipei Sheraton Hotel, a woman stormed into the 17th-floor VIP lounge. When police arrived, she claimed to be the general manager and caused a disturbance. Lawyer Xu Wanwei of Fuda Law Firm stated that disruptive behavior under the Social Order Maintenance Act is not limited to public places; disturbing residents or businesses also falls within the scope of the regulations. In this case, the perpetrator trespassed into a hotel without cause…

拿模型槍是否會構成恐嚇公眾罪或恐嚇危害安全罪

Chi Lin-lien gifted a "model gun," Hsieh Lung-chieh defended it, saying it was to combat corruption. Lawyer Li Yu-sheng explained the potential legal violations of displaying model guns in public places.

KMT Vice Chairman Chi Lin-lien presented a model gun to Legislator Hsieh Lung-chieh at a veterans' appreciation dinner in Tainan. Chi even mimed loading the magazine and cocking the gun, claiming it was made by a Marine Corps factory and urging Hsieh to "fire a shot." This action sparked discussion. Hsieh clarified twice, stating that "giving a gun is firstly to set the stage, secondly to combat corruption and collusion between officials and businesses, and thirdly to maintain public order and protect the city's safety," asking people not to make a fuss. Regarding the source of the model gun, Chi responded that it was a commemorative gun produced by a Marine Corps company. Lawyer Li Yu-sheng of Fidelity Law Firm stated that even if the gun Hsieh wielded was a model, if its appearance in public was likely to mislead the average person into believing it was a real gun, it could still violate social order maintenance...

助理費,高虹安

Kao Hung-an has passed the initial screening! The cases of Yen Kuan-heng, Lin Tai-hua, and Lin Yi-chin allegedly defrauding assistant fees remain unresolved. Lawyer Li Yu-sheng explains the practical criteria for determining whether fraudulently obtaining assistant fees constitutes embezzlement.

Kao Hung-an's case temporarily resolved! The cases of Yen Kuan-heng, Lin Tai-hua, and Lin Yi-chin's alleged fraud involving assistant fees remain unresolved | ETtoday News reporters Liao Wei-hong and Huang Hao-che. News Links: Related News: Related News: Related News: Related News: Second trial in Hsinchu Mayor Kao Hung-an's assistant fee case…

恐嚇罪,恐嚇危害安全罪

The man who posted the message, threatening people, has been arrested and indicted for intimidation after being exposed as an EMBA business owner. Following the random killing incident, a copycat effect has led to 94 intimidation cases across Taiwan.

A man who posted threatening remarks on Facebook, claiming that not enough people had died, turned out to be an EMBA graduate and business owner suspected of intimidation. He has been arrested and indicted. Following the random killing case, a copycat effect has emerged, with 94 intimidation cases reported across Taiwan. | SET News reporters Yu Tao and Chien Han-ming. News Link: Attorney Li Yu-sheng of Fidelity Law Firm stated that the perpetrator's public threatening remarks on Facebook were sufficient to cause panic among those who saw the post. The perpetrator is suspected of committing the crime of intimidating the public, which carries a sentence of up to two years imprisonment. Due to the relatively clear evidence and the sensitive timing, the prosecution swiftly indicted him to deter such illegal acts of intimidation through proactive investigation. Line online consultation hotline. Legal consultation with Fidelity Law Firm. Line:…