Telephone
02-77093611
Line
@fdlaw
address
17th Floor, No. 180, Section 2, Dunhua South Road, Da'an District, Taipei City
News Headline:Passenger refuses to pay taxi fare; assaults police officer and causes injury while being taken to police station.
Media Source:TVBS News
reporter:Jiang Yunman
According to news reports, a passenger allegedly refused to pay the fare after taking a taxi. The driver took the passenger to the police station, whereupon the passenger attacked and injured officers. Such incidents may involve fare payment, fraud, obstruction of official duties, and assault, and should not be treated as simple consumer disputes.
News Summary
According to a TVBS news report, an incident occurred in Zhonghe District, New Taipei City, where a passenger refused to pay a taxi fare. The driver took the passenger to the police station, but the passenger lost control at the scene, assaulted a police officer, and injured the officer's hand. The report also mentioned that the passenger subsequently faced legal proceedings for obstructing official duties.
These types of cases often involve two levels of disputes. First, whether the passenger's non-payment is merely a civil matter, or whether they intended to obtain the transportation service without paying from the outset. Second, if, upon arriving at the police station, the passenger pushes, pulls, attacks, or obstructs officers from performing their duties according to the law, the original fare dispute may escalate into a criminal case.
Lawyer Li Yusheng explains
Attorney Li Yusheng of Fidelity Law Firm stated that refusing to pay taxi fares does not necessarily constitute a crime in every instance. If a passenger only has temporary difficulty paying, such as a dead phone battery, an invalid credit card, or insufficient cash, it generally leans towards civil debt or consumer disputes. However, if a passenger had no intention of paying in the first place but still took the taxi and obtained the transportation service, the law may further consider fraudulent gains.
As for assaulting police officers at a police station, the legal risks are significantly higher. According to Article 135 of the Criminal Code, using force or coercion against a public official while they are lawfully performing their duties may constitute obstruction of official business. If the officer suffers bodily or health harm as a result, they may also be charged with assault under Article 277 of the Criminal Code. In practice, police body cameras, police station surveillance footage, medical examination reports, and statements from officers at the scene usually serve as crucial evidence.
Attorney Li Yusheng also reminded drivers that when faced with a refusal to pay fares, they should avoid taking coercive measures themselves. A safer approach is to preserve the dashcam footage, in-vehicle video, meter readings, route details, and conversation logs, and then call the police. If a driver forcibly restricts a passenger's freedom without legal basis or necessity, it may lead to legal disputes.
Legal Disputes and Practical Reminders
I. Refusing to pay fares is not necessarily just a civil issue.
If a passenger is only having difficulty paying after the fact, they usually tend to make a civil claim for the fare; however, if they did not intend to pay in the first place but still took the ride and obtained the service, it may involve fraudulent profiteering.
Second, assaulting a police officer may constitute obstruction of official duties.
If police officers are pushed, attacked, or obstructed by passengers in a violent manner while handling disputes or performing their duties in accordance with the law, they may be involved in the crime of obstructing official duties under criminal law.
III. Other liability for injury may exist for police officers.
If an attack causes injury to a police officer's hands, body, or health, it may constitute an assault charge in addition to obstructing official duties, and may affect sentencing and settlement options.
IV. Drivers should preserve video and payment receipts.
If you encounter a driver refusing to pay the fare, it is recommended to keep records of your dashcam footage, in-car surveillance footage, meter readings, route details, and police report information to avoid conflicting accounts later on.
FAQ
Does refusing to pay a taxi fare constitute fraud?
It depends on whether the passenger initially intended to pay. If it's just a temporary inability to pay, it might be a civil dispute; but if they intended to ride without paying from the beginning, it could involve fraudulent gain.
Will pushing and hitting police officers at a police station necessarily turn into a criminal case?
If a police officer is lawfully performing his/her duties, and a passenger obstructs or attacks the officer through violence or coercion, it may constitute obstruction of official business. If injury is caused, it may also constitute assault.
Can a driver take a passenger who refuses to pay the fare directly to the police station?
In practice, each case should be judged individually. When encountering disputes, drivers should prioritize calling the police and preserving evidence, and avoid handling the situation themselves in ways that may restrict passengers' freedom, so as to prevent legal disputes from arising.
What evidence should drivers or passengers preserve in the event of a fare dispute?
It is recommended to preserve dashcam footage, in-car video, meter readings, payment records, travel routes, conversations, police reports, and medical examination reports. The more complete the evidence, the easier it will be to clarify liability.
References and regulations
This article referencesTVBS News Reportand news video content, and refer toArticle 135 of the Criminal Law,Article 277 of the Criminal LawandArticle 339 of the Criminal Law.
Fidelity Law Firm Contact Information
Fuda Law Firm
Line：https://line.me/ti/p/@fdlaw
Tel:0277093611
Facebook:https://www.facebook.com/fudalawyer
website:https://fdlaw.com.tw/
e-mail:info@fdlaw.com.tw