肇事逃逸,易科罰金,車禍

A "finance man" ran over a rider's left foot with his car and fled in the chaos. Attorney Li Yusheng explains the statutory sentence for hit-and-run and the factors judges consider when sentencing.

駕車輾過騎士左腳 “金融男”趁亂落跑涉肇逃 |三立新聞 記者 王怡淇 廖奕暘  新聞連結: 富達法律事務所李育昇律師表示,本件行為人涉犯肇事逃逸罪,法定刑期為6個月以上5年以下,因行為人已坦承犯罪且與被害人達成和解,故法官判處最低的6個月有期徒刑,並給予易科罰金與緩刑;反之,在其他肇事逃逸案件中,若犯罪者未與被害人達成和解、不承認犯罪,且造成被害人傷害較嚴重,最重仍有可能處以5年有期徒刑。 富達法律事務所Line:話:0…

正當防衛,互毆,防衛過當

Taipei Metro clashes! A passenger in a cross-dressing outfit kicked a woman in a priority seat, dissatisfied with being forced to give up her seat. Lawyer Li Yusheng explains the legal issues of self-defense and mutual assault.

Taipei Metro Clash! Passenger in Crossdress Kicks Woman in Priority Seat, "Unhappy with Being Forced to Give Up Her Seat" | FTV News Reporter Ma Shengjie News Link: A heated scene unfolded on the MRT train! Priority seats have been renamed, and there's no requirement to give up your seat. A younger passenger in the priority seat was repeatedly pushed by a white-haired woman using her bag, forcing her to give up her seat! The young passenger stood up and kicked the woman right back! Attorney Li Yusheng of Fidelity Law Firm stated that in this case, the elderly woman initially struck the seated passenger twice with the bag. If the passenger retaliated to avoid unlawful assault, this could be considered legitimate self-defense and not punishable. However, if the defensive action was excessive, or the kick was intended to attack the elderly woman, and if she was injured, she could still suffer…

翻供,偽證,串供,串證

In the Jinghuacheng case, Shen Qingjing testified in court, alleging a third person solicited bribes and was familiar with Lin Qinrong. Attorney Li Yusheng explained legal issues related to the defendant's recantation and perjury.

In the Jinghuacheng case, Shen Qingjing testified in court, alleging a third person solicited bribes and was familiar with Lin Chin-jung. │FTV News reporter Huang Guocheng News link: The Taipei District Court continues its trial of former People's Party Chairman Ko Wen-je in the Jinghuacheng case. Today, in addition to summoning Ko Wen-je, Ying Hsiao-wei, and Ying Hsiao-wei's assistant Wu Shun-min, defendant Shen Qingjing also appeared as a witness. Shen Qingjing maintained that he was merely complaining, not making a complaint. He also revealed in court that a third person solicited bribes and was familiar with Lin Chin-jung. Attorney Li Yusheng of Fidelity Law Firm stated that Shen Qingjing's statement during the court hearing that the Jinghuacheng case was blocked by Lin Chin-jung and therefore not reported to Ko Wen-je cast a different picture of the case and appeared to be an attempt to exonerate Ko. He stated that he did not make a complaint at the time, but only made a complaint...

販毒,吸毒,持有毒品,毒品律師

A train was packed with drug-smuggled coffee bags after being arrested in front of a popular porridge shop on Shezi Island. Lawyer Li Yusheng explains the criminal liability associated with drug possession, drug use, and drug trafficking.

A suspect was arrested in front of a famous Shezi Island porridge shop, with a car filled with drug-laced coffee packets. │TVBS News reporters Guo Ying, Yan Shengfen, and Yu Xinhan News link: Late at night, police officers arrived to apprehend a suspect in front of a famous mushroom and pork porridge shop on Shezi Island in Taipei City. He was stopped for a shaky bike. When officers discovered a large number of drug-laced coffee packets hidden inside his car, he attempted to flee and even lost control and choked the officers. After being handcuffed and arrested, he pleaded not guilty to drug trafficking. Attorney Li Yusheng of Fidelity Law Firm stated that personal use of Class II drugs carries a prison sentence of up to three years, while possession or sale with intent to sell can carry a sentence of up to life imprisonment or more than 10 years. Therefore, suspects arrested often plead personal use to mitigate their sentence. However, if the quantity of drugs seized is large…

洗錢防制法,傳喚證人

In an unprecedented move, the main suspect in a money laundering case has been granted permission by the court to call 720 witnesses. A criminal lawyer from Fidelity Law Firm explains the Money Laundering Prevention Act and the relevant regulations for calling witnesses.

News and Video Source: Case Background and Legal Disputes - Unprecedented! The main suspect in a money laundering case requests the summoning of 720 witnesses, which is granted by the court. | FTV News Reporter Huang Guocheng. Taiwan's largest cryptocurrency exchange, "CoinThink Technology," is involved in money laundering of NT$2.3 billion. Including the main suspect, Shih Chi-jen, 14 people have been indicted. The main suspect's defense lawyer questioned the admissibility of police interrogation records from victims as evidence and, unprecedentedly, requested 1,544 victims to testify in court. The court filtered half of them, ultimately granting the rare privilege of 720 witnesses to appear in court. The trial is scheduled for nine days from January to April next year, with 80 witnesses appearing in court each time. A criminal lawyer from Fidelity Law Firm stated that this case involves the Money Laundering Prevention Act. While defense lawyers or prosecutors can summon a majority of witnesses to testify in criminal trials, the court also has the right to review…

竊盜,侵占,侵占遺失物

My beloved dog was stolen! A female defense lawyer was arrested for mistaking a stray dog. Lawyer Li Yusheng explains the elements and criminal liability of theft and misappropriation of lost property.

A beloved dog was stolen! A female defense lawyer was arrested for "mistaking it for a stray dog" | TVBS News reporters Jiang Yunman, Yan Shengfen, and Yan Ruisheng News link: A man in Yonghe, New Taipei City, was answering a phone call outside a pet shop when his beloved dog followed him outside. Within minutes, the furry friend was taken away by a stranger. Police reviewed surveillance footage to identify the suspect, who claimed she took the dog home after mistaking it for a stray. She was subsequently charged with theft. Attorney Li Yusheng of Fidelity Law Firm stated that if it is objectively clear that an unleashed puppy has an owner, but the owner is still taken, this constitutes theft under the criminal law. Even if the perpetrator claims they mistakenly believed the dog had no owner, they may still be charged with misappropriation of lost property. However, if the perpetrator took the puppy away but took it for a microchip scan, then the dog could be identified...