Telephone
02-77093611
Line
@fdlaw
address
17th Floor, No. 180, Section 2, Dunhua South Road, Da'an District, Taipei City
Telephone
02-77093611
Line
@fdlaw
address
17th Floor, No. 180, Section 2, Dunhua South Road, Da'an District, Taipei City
Many small and medium-sized enterprises, family businesses, and even companies that have been established for many years may have an item in their balance sheet or general ledger called "Shareholder Transactions".
The amount may only be a few hundred thousand yuan, or it may accumulate to:
Even hundreds of millions of yuan.
The company may not have paid special attention to this under normal circumstances, until:
It is only when a dispute arises between the responsible parties that it is suddenly discovered that no one can clearly explain what the "shareholder transactions" on the books actually represent.
However, "shareholder transactions" is merely an accounting term.
The real legal and tax issues are:Who gives the money to whom?Why give it?Is there an agreement regarding the return of the money?Is there interest?Is this money a loan, advance payment, salary, expense, surplus, or company funds used for personal purposes?Therefore, when examining shareholder transactions, the first question shouldn't be, "Is this account allowed to exist?"
Instead, first:Fund flow + legal reasons + accounting treatmentLet's put it all back together.
The company's books state: "Shareholder transactions do not necessarily mean that they are loans in law."
It may represent:
Or other transactions.
So what the IRS, the courts, or accountants will really be asking isn't, "What's the account name?"
Instead:Why is this money actually being moved?
Faced with verification and subsequent remedies, it should be handled byTax lawyers and IRS tax audits and administrative remediesFrom this perspective, first confirm the direction and legal nature of the funds.
may be:Shareholder loans, advances made by shareholders, and company debts to shareholders.
core:Why is the company charging this money?
may be:Repayment of old loans, loan disbursements, company advances, and private use by shareholders.
core:Why are the shareholders able to receive this money?
The directions are different, and the tax, corporate law, and legal responsibilities are completely different.
From a corporate accounting perspective, "shareholder transactions" usually require the following distinction:
This usually means that the company has receivables from its shareholders, which is:Shareholders may owe the company money.For example: If a company gives 5 million yuan to its shareholders for their use, it will be recorded as a debit entry to the shareholders' accounts.
This usually represents: the company has outstanding payments to its shareholders, that is:The company may owe money to its shareholders.For example, if a shareholder contributes 3 million yuan to the company for operation, the company's accounts will record it as a credit transaction with the shareholder.
But this is only the general accounting direction.
The actual case still needs to be confirmed:
Company accounting policies.
Don't just look at the debit/credit side and immediately make a legal judgment.
This usually means that the shareholders may owe the company money.
Prioritize checking: Company → Shareholders' funds, repayments, interest, Income Tax Law Article 24-3, Company Law Article 15.
This usually means that the company may owe money to its shareholders.
Priority checks should be conducted on: shareholders' and company's funds, the authenticity of loans, repayments, interest, withholdings, and interest expenses.
The above is a general accounting approach, but confirmation still requires actual ledger records and transaction facts.
When a company is short of operating funds, it is common in practice for shareholders to lend their personal funds to the company.
But the essential details should be left out:
Use of funds.
Only if the company returns the money to the shareholders in the future can it be clearly proven that this is:Repayment of shareholder loansRather than: the company gives funds to shareholders without a reason.
Formal contracts usually provide clarity.
But the case cannot be solved simply because "there is no formal IOU".
Therefore, the loan is deemed non-existent.
It is still possible from:
The company's financial statements reconstruct the true legal relationship.
Conversely, even if a "loan agreement" can be produced afterward, if the bank's cash flow does not match the actual situation at all, the paper agreement alone cannot prove everything.
If the direction of funds is reversed:Company → ShareholdersIt cannot be treated as a typical shareholder transaction.
At least the following should be checked simultaneously:
Do we need to calculate interest income?
Is the company's lending of funds legal?
Who approved this funding?
Do shareholders have an obligation to return the money?
If there is no legal basis whatsoever, is there any question of misappropriation, breach of trust, embezzlement, or other doubts?
These are different levels, and cannot be simply described as "recorded in the accounting books".
Then answer all the questions.
Who pays whom?
Loan, repayment, advance payment, expense, or something else?
How should this be recorded? Is it necessary to calculate interest? Is interest expense acceptable?
Article 15 of the Company Law? Liability of the person in charge? Have company assets been misappropriated?
According to the current lawIncome Tax LawArticle 24-3, Paragraph 2: If a company lends funds to a shareholder or any other person without charging interest or with an agreed-upon low interest rate, the interest rate shall be calculated based on the Taiwan Bank benchmark interest rate as of January 1st of the year in which the funds were lent.Interest incomeTaxation.
In other words, even if the company truly hasn't received a single penny of interest, it may still be subject to taxation requirements.Calculate the interest income.
Simply put: the company is giving away its own funds to others for free.
Although no interest has been received in the accounts, tax law may require the calculation of interest income that should be included in the company's revenue.
For example: The company provides a sum of money to its shareholders for use without interest for a long period of time.
The company might think, "Since we haven't received any interest, we have no revenue."
However, Article 24-3 of the Income Tax Act deals with this situation.
Therefore, what really needs to be calculated is:
Taiwan Bank's benchmark interest rate on January 1 of that year.
Do not directly use the fixed interest rate from other years.
Each year, the interest rate should be recalculated according to the laws and interest rates of that year.
Accounting subject names cannot replace the substance of a transaction.
For example, the company's accounts state:
Other exchanges.
In reality, the company has been entrusting its funds to shareholders or related parties for long-term use.
The IRS may still look back to see how the funds were actually used.
Therefore, don't assume that as long as it's not called "shareholder transactions"...
Therefore, there is no issue with Article 24-3 of the Income Tax Law.
Commonly checked items:
Year-end balance.
For example, if the accounts show a high amount of shareholder debit balances at the end of each year, and these balances have not been settled for many years, the IRS may naturally ask further questions: What exactly is this money?
Why can shareholders use it for a long time?
Did you charge interest?
When you first receive the notification, you can first understand...This is the first explanation of how to prepare after receiving a tax audit or tax adjustment notice from the National Taxation Bureau..
At this point, in addition to Article 24-3 of the Income Tax Law, the following should also be checked: the company's own:Interest expense.According to the current lawCorporate Income Tax Verification StandardsArticle 97, Paragraph 11, If it is a profit-making enterprise:
On the other hand, funds may be lent out interest-free or the interest received may be lower than the interest paid. For the interest paid on the loan amount, or the related difference, it is possible that:It is not recognized as the company's interest expense.Therefore, the real tax issue in some cases is not just: "How much interest income should be calculated?"
Another possible question is: "Can the company fully recognize the interest expenses it originally declared?"
For example: Company A lends 10 million yuan to its shareholders without interest.
The tax analysis might differ depending on whether the 10 million yuan was originally the company's own funds or the company borrowed 10 million yuan from a bank, paid 4% in interest, and then lent the money to the shareholders for free.
Therefore, when organizing shareholder transactions, do not only do the section from "Company → Shareholder".
We still need to keep chasing:Where does the company's money come from?
Company → Shareholders
If no interest is collected or the interest rate is too low, check Article 24-3 of the Income Tax Act to calculate interest income.
Bank → Company → Shareholder
When a company pays loan interest on one hand and lends out loans at no or low interest rates on the other, it must also check the interest expense adjustment in Article 97, Paragraph 11 of the auditing standard.
Don't just look at who the company lends money to; you also need to trace where the company's money comes from.
It is essential to include the following here:Taxationand:Company Lawseparate.
The income tax law stipulates how to tax funds when a company lends money to its shareholders, but this does not mean that any company lending money to its shareholders is automatically legal under company law.
in force"Company LawArticle 15 of the principle stipulates that company funds shall not be arbitrarily lent to shareholders or any other person.
The law stipulates:
Or: exceptions include situations where there is a need for short-term financing between companies or between banks.
The short-term financing portion is subject to legal restrictions such as net asset value 40%.
Therefore, if the recipient is an individual shareholder, it is especially important not to use the statement "shareholder loan" in the account.
The issue of presupposing company law has been resolved.
Won't.
The two laws address different issues.
Solution: Can company funds be lent in this way?
Handling: When company funds have been lent to shareholders or others, how should the relevant income tax be calculated?
Therefore, a transaction may require the calculation of interest under tax law, and at the same time, it still needs to be checked under corporate law to see if the loan is legal.
Taxation does not legalize corporate actions.
According to Article 15 of the current Company Law, when a company's responsible person violates restrictions on lending funds, the law will impose the following penalties:
There are provisions regarding liability for damages.
Therefore, the chairman or person in charge cannot simply say, "This money is recorded in shareholder transactions, and the company will recover it later."
It should also be confirmed whether the company originally had the right to lend out the funds.
Has interest been calculated?
Can the company get a loan?
Who approved it? Has the company suffered any losses?
Is it a normal loan, or is the company's funds being illegally misappropriated?
This issue should not be resolved solely by accounting entries.
For example, a company paying on behalf of its shareholders:
Personal taxes.
The company's accounts record everything as "Shareholder Transactions".
The law still needs to ask: Is this a loan?
Salary?
dividend?
Payment on behalf of someone else?
Other benefits?
Or were company funds misused for private purposes?
Different legal natures can lead to completely different corporate law and tax consequences.
so:Shareholder transactions cannot be used as a universal temporary account for all private expenditures.
It cannot be simplified in this way.
Should be seen:
Does it happen repeatedly?
For example, if you repay the loan at the end of the month and then lend it out again a few days later, you may repeatedly tie up a large amount of capital. You cannot simply look at the statement: "The year-end balance is already zero."
A full annual cash flow should still be examined.
Do not use the year-end book balance as the sole criterion.
Article 24-3 of the Income Tax Law deals with: the actual period of fund lending.
Therefore, the real task is to organize: each time:
interest rate.
Don't just use the balance sheet as of December 31st to answer questions about the use of funds throughout the year.
This is a very common controversy.
First, we should find out: When did the previous shareholders transfer money to the company?
How did the company record this in its accounts at that time?
Are there any shareholder-related lending transactions?
What will the company do with this money?
How much will be refunded now?
Can the preceding and following statements be reconciled?
If a shareholder did borrow 10 million yuan from the company in the past, and the company is now returning 5 million yuan, it may essentially just be repaying the original debt.
But what if there is no record of shareholder loans at all, yet the IRS only claims, "We previously advanced funds," after conducting an audit?
This requires objective evidence to support it.
If the company owes money to its shareholders, it may be necessary to confirm:
Whether it was withheld in accordance with the law.
Especially when the amount is large, it should not just be a single number in the account.
Ideally, we should go back to the real: shareholder → corporate bank cash flow.
Requirements:
Regulations related to interest rate limits, etc.
According to the corporate income tax audit guidelines, interest on loans taken out by companies outside the financial industry cannot be recognized without any restrictions.
Therefore, a company borrowing money from its shareholders and a company lending money to its shareholders are two completely different tax implications.
Don't confuse them under the same category: "Shareholder Transactions"
No further analysis will be conducted after the subject.
meeting.
Article 24-3, Paragraph 1 of the Income Tax Law further stipulates that: For companies organizing:
If an inspector fails to pay company funds collected on behalf of the company within the appropriate period, or misappropriates company funds, the inspector shall, in accordance with the law, calculate the company's interest income for the relevant period and tax it accordingly.
Therefore, Article 24.3 does not only apply if a formal corporate loan agreement is signed.
If, in reality, company funds are being misappropriated by relevant personnel for an extended period, caution is also warranted.
Article 24-3, paragraph 1 of the Income Tax Act contains an exception.
If the company is indeed:
If the act is fraudulent and meets the conditions stipulated in the article, such as: a lawsuit has been filed in accordance with the law or a public prosecution has been initiated by a prosecutor, the law stipulates that: no related interest income shall be calculated.
Therefore, if the company itself is:The victimYou can't say: "The company lends money to its shareholders."
He: "Company funds were illegally taken away."
They are considered the same thing.
At this point, the tax and the company's losses should be handled separately.
First, confirm: Who took the money?
Is there any company authorized?
What is its purpose?
Did the company gain any benefit?
Do we need to return it?
Has the company taken any legal action?
If it actually belongs to:
If other company assets are infringed, then a separate procedure should be initiated:
Evidence preservation framework.
Don't leave all funds in "shareholder transactions" for extended periods just for accounting convenience.
From the perspective of protecting assets by the company or minority shareholders, please refer to...How to audit and trace cash flow when shareholders suspect that the person in charge has misappropriated company funds?.
Tax evasion will not automatically constitute a criminal offense simply because the amount involved is large.
The IRS may conduct an initial inspection:
The true purpose of the funds.
Whether this further involves criminal liability under the Tax Collection Law depends on:
The tax amount will be determined separately.
so:pay an overdue taxand:criminal offensesWe still cannot directly equate them.
If there are other inaccurate accounting records or specific criminal allegations, they should be distinguished separately.Fake transactions, false invoices, and tax and criminal liability.
At least organize:
Detailed breakdown of each item.
Actual transactions between the company and its shareholders.
From which year did this money begin?
If you advocate lending.
How much to pay each time?
Whether it is agreed upon, paid for, or calculated.
Is it the company's own funds or bank loans?
What do the shareholders do with it?
Who approved it?
How to record each transaction.
Don't just submit: a balance from the year-end balance sheet.
For example:
At this point, it's not appropriate to simply say, "The debit balance of shareholder transactions in 2025 was 3 million yuan."
What really needs to be confirmed is: how much of it is:
How much is:
Does it need to calculate interest?
The model of individual shareholders cannot be used entirely.
If both parties to the transaction are companies or firms, in addition to taxation, Article 15 of the Companies Act applies to:
Short-term financing has specific exceptions and restrictions.
If it is also a related company, or even a foreign related company, it may further involve:
Other tax regulations.
This article still focuses on shareholder transactions and general lending.
Financing cases involving complex multinational relationships should be evaluated separately.
no.
For example, in the case of financing between two companies: even if the conditions for lending funds are met under company law, separate confirmation is still required for tax purposes.
Whether adjustments are required in accordance with the Income Tax Law or other tax regulations.
so:Company Lawand:No tax adjustments are needed.It's not the same thing.
If you have already received it:
Before imposing a fine, the following should be confirmed: the date of service and the statutory period for relief.
If it is still within the period, it can be assessed in accordance with the law:
Administrative litigation.
In shareholder transactions, in particular, the common points of contention are not just calculation errors, but also the different understandings of the legal nature of funds between the IRS and the company.
For example:
The company's claim is to return the original advances made by the shareholders.
What's really needed at this point is a complete record of cash flows and accounts for the preceding and following years.
Once a disciplinary action has been taken, it should be confirmed promptly.Review, appeal and administrative litigation after receiving supplementary tax or fines.
Because the same company funds may involve:
Even criminal liability.
For example, if a minority shareholder discovers that the company has been handing over money to the person in charge for many years, they might ask, "Why is all the company's money being used for shareholder transactions?"
At this point, the case will move from the tax aspect to the following:
Responsibilities of the person in charge.
Therefore, the same accounting item can lead to completely different legal issues depending on the perspective of different parties involved.
In cases like these, you can't just show the balance sheet to the lawyer.
What truly needs rebuilding is:Shareholders ↔ CompanyFor each transaction:
Company decision-making.
To divide it further:
Are there any interest or income adjustments included?
Does the loan comply with the Company Law?
Has the company's funds been misappropriated by specific shareholders or responsible persons for an extended period of time?
Is there any issue of restitution, damages, or criminal liability?
Attorney Li Yusheng previously served as the assistant manager of the legal department at Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu, where he worked extensively with accountants, corporate finance teams, and company management on corporate, accounting, tax, and legal issues.
The real crux of these cases isn't: "How should the shareholder transaction account be recorded?"
Instead:Whose money is this? Why was it moved? And how should it be legally classified?
It can also be used normally.Corporate legal counsel and daily legal risks for businessesManage and retain loan, repayment, and company authorization information.
"Shareholder transactions" is usually an account used in company books to record fund transfers between the company and its shareholders, but it is not an independent legal relationship in itself. It is still necessary to confirm the direction and reason for the funds, such as a shareholder lending money to the company, the company repaying a shareholder loan, the company lending funds to a shareholder, or other advances made on behalf of the shareholder.
From a company accounting perspective, this usually indicates that the company has receivables from its shareholders, which may represent that the shareholders owe the company money; however, it is still necessary to confirm this based on the actual accounting books, vouchers, and cash flow, and one cannot draw conclusions based solely on the account name.
This typically indicates that the company has a liability to its shareholders, such as when shareholders lend money or advance funds to the company. However, bank statements and original transaction records should still be retained to prove the source of this company liability.
For tax purposes, Article 24-3 of the Income Tax Act may require companies to calculate interest income; under the Company Act, Article 15, which restricts lending of funds, must also be examined. The ability to calculate taxable income under tax law does not automatically make lending of funds legal under company law.
Article 24-3 of the Income Tax Act stipulates that when a company lends funds to shareholders or others without receiving interest or at a low interest rate, the company's interest income shall still be calculated based on the benchmark interest rate of the Bank of Taiwan on January 1 of the year in which the loan period pertains, provided that applicable conditions are met.
It's not a fixed interest rate. According to the law, the rate should be based on the Bank of Taiwan's benchmark interest rate on January 1st of the year in which the loan was made; therefore, it may vary from year to year.
Not necessarily. If a company borrows money and pays interest on one hand, and lends it out interest-free or at a low interest rate on the other, it is necessary to check whether the interest expense originally reported by the company should be adjusted in accordance with Article 97 of the Audit Guidelines for Profit-Based Enterprise Income Tax.
It cannot be solved solely by accounting entries. It is still necessary to determine the true legal nature of the transaction—whether it is a loan, advance payment, salary, distribution, other benefits, or private use of company funds. Different characterizations will result in different tax and corporate law outcomes.
You can't just look at the year-end balance. What you really need to do is confirm the actual loan period, each loan disbursement and repayment date and amount, and then calculate according to the law.
Possibly. Tax authorities will examine the substance of the transaction. If other receivables actually represent company funds used by shareholders or others for long-term purposes, the account name itself will not change the true nature of the funds.
First, it should be confirmed whether the funds were legally authorized by the company, whether it truly constitutes a loan, a repayment obligation, and any restrictions under company law. If the company funds were actually misappropriated, it may involve further civil, corporate, or criminal liabilities, and cannot be handled solely using accounting entries.
If the case is still within the statutory period, it can be reviewed, appealed, or subject to administrative litigation depending on the type of disposal. These types of cases often require cross-year bank transaction and shareholder transaction details to prove the true nature of the funds.