洗錢防制法,傳喚證人

Unprecedented! The main suspect in a money laundering case has been granted permission by the court to call 720 witnesses. Attorney Li Xin explains the Money Laundering Prevention Act and the relevant regulations for calling witnesses.

In an unprecedented move, the court granted the request to summon 720 witnesses in a money laundering case. The case involves NT$2.3 billion in money laundering by the main suspect, Shih Chi-jen. Fourteen people, including the main suspect, have been indicted. The main suspect's defense lawyer questioned the admissibility of police interrogation records from victims, and in an unprecedented move, requested 1,544 victims to testify. The court filtered half of these, ultimately granting the rare permission for 720 witnesses to appear in court. The trial is scheduled for nine days from January to April next year, with eighty witnesses appearing at each hearing. Attorney Li Hsin of Fidelity Law Firm stated that this case involves the Money Laundering Prevention Act. While defense lawyers or prosecutors can summon a majority of witnesses to court in criminal trials, the court also considers whether each summoned witness is truly necessary…

貪污罪,高虹安,助理費

Dramatic Reversal! Kao Hung-an's corruption charge dropped; she was sentenced to 6 months in second trial. The High Court ruled that the assistant's fee was a subsidy that legislators could dispose of and did not constitute corruption.

Dramatic Reversal! Ko Hung-an's Corruption Charges Overturned, Sentenced to 6 Months in Second Trial | TVBS News Reporter Yan Shengfen News Links: Related News: Related News: Related News: Related News: Ko Hung-an, involved in fraudulent assistant fee case, was sentenced to 7 years in prison for corruption in the first trial…

高虹安,貪污,貪污治罪條例,助理費

The case of Gao Hong'an's assistant has taken a dramatic turn! The second instance verdict was reduced to 6 months, which can be commuted to a fine. The embezzlement charges were revoked, and Gao Hong'an is eligible for reinstatement. She stated that she will return to her position as mayor as soon as possible.

A major reversal in Gao Hongan's assistant fee case! The second instance verdict was reduced to 6 months, commutable to a fine; the embezzlement charge was dropped; conditions for reinstatement are met. Gao Hongan: I will return to the mayoral position as soon as possible. | Reporters You Tao and Zheng Xiangren News Links: Related News: Related News: Related News: Related News:…

貪污罪,貪污治罪條例

Dramatic Reversal! Kao Hung-An's embezzlement charges dropped; "Reinstatement process to be completed swiftly." The Kao Hung-An assistant fee case does not constitute the crime of abusing one's position to defraud under the Anti-Corruption Act.

Dramatic Reversal! Kao Hung-an's Corruption Charges Dropped; "Reinstatement Process to be Completed Immediately" | ETtoday News Reporters Tsai Yu-shan, Chen Ming-sheng, Wang Yi-hsuan News Links: Related News: Related News: Related News: Related News: Hsinchu Mayor Kao Hung-an, Fraudulently Obtained Assistant Fees…

搜索票,收到刑事搜索票怎麼辦

Taipei District Prosecutors Office launches investigation into paparazzi case! Five search warrant applications rejected, investigation hits roadblock! Lawyer Lee Yu-sheng explains the reasons for the judge's rejections after five failed attempts to obtain search warrants.

Taipei District Prosecutors Office Launches Investigation into Paparazzi Case! Five Search Warrant Applications Rejected. The investigation into the paparazzi case has hit a roadblock! Taipei District Prosecutors Office's search warrant applications have failed five times. | Sanlih News Reporter Yu Tao, Zheng Xiangren. News Link: Lawyer Li Yusheng of Fidelity Law Firm stated that applying for a search warrant requires concrete facts proving someone committed a crime, and there must be a necessity for the search, meaning there is evidence that may have been concealed, altered, or destroyed. In this case, the prosecutor has not fully explained these reasons, so the search warrant application may be rejected. Fidelity Law Firm Line:…

廣告不實,欺騙消費者

A wealthy woman in the US sues kindergartens that teach Chinese and Taiwanese, claiming her child is losing at the starting line. She is seeking $1.86 million in damages. Is this a false advertisement?

A wealthy Taiwanese woman sued a kindergarten in the US that advertised "all-American" Chinese and Taiwanese education, claiming her child was losing at the starting line. The woman sought NT$1.86 million in damages, but the contract did not explicitly state that all courses would be taught in English. The judge ruled against her. (Reported by Wu Yunqian and Zheng Xiangren of Sanlih News. Link: Lawyer Li Yusheng of Fidelity Law Firm stated that while the kindergarten's advertisement boasted "all-American," this is a common advertising term for English-speaking kindergartens. Furthermore, the contract did not explicitly stipulate that all courses would be taught in English. Therefore, the judge deemed the parents' claim unfounded. However, the advertisement's use of "all-American" could mislead the public into believing the kindergarten offered entirely English-speaking instruction, potentially constituting misleading advertising…)