貪污治罪條例的圖利罪跟政府採購法

Procurement work leading to jail time? Three major pitfalls of the "Government Procurement Law" that could inadvertently constitute "profiteering"! A legal self-protection guide for civil servants.

Last Updated: November 1, 2025 | Author: Attorney Li Yusheng (Focusing Attorney at Fidelity Law Firm / Guest Legal Commentator for Political Talk Shows) Foreword: The Dilemma of Procurement Personnel: Doing Well is Duty, Making Mistakes is "Profiteering"? In the civil service system, procurement positions are often considered "high-risk, dead-end jobs." Procurement personnel not only need to be familiar with the complex "Government Procurement Law," but also have to face pressure from suppliers and demands from superiors. Most frighteningly, a careless procedural flaw may not just result in administrative penalties, but directly escalate to "profiteering" under the "Anti-Corruption Act." Many civil servants summoned by prosecutors often cry foul: "I didn't take a single penny from the supplier; I was just rushing to meet deadlines!" But Fidelity Law Firm must seriously remind you: profiteering does not require receiving money. As long as you violate procurement regulations and allow the supplier to profit, you have already stepped into the deep waters of the law. I. Why does violating the "Government Procurement Law" become "profiteering"...

貪污治罪條例中包含行賄罪、收賄罪、圖利罪等

Did a civil servant inadvertently commit "profiteering"? Was it administrative negligence or corruption? A lawyer teaches you three golden steps to survive before prosecutorial interrogation.

Last Updated: October 31, 2025 | Author: Attorney Li Yusheng (Lead Attorney at Fidelity Law Firm / Guest Legal Commentator for Political Talk Shows) Foreword: A Civil Servant's Nightmare: Just a Moment of Negligence or a Crime? In the civil service, many conscientious civil servants often face a fear: despite not accepting any bribes or kickbacks, simply acting to facilitate the public or due to negligence in administrative procedures, they suddenly receive a summons from the investigation authorities, accused of "profiteering" under the Anti-Corruption Act. If you or your relatives are facing questioning by the Independent Commission Against Corruption (ICAC) or the Investigation Bureau, please remain calm. "Convenience" and "profiteering" are often separated by a thin line, and defining this line is the core of legal debate. This article, written by a professional corruption lawyer from Fidelity Law Firm, will analyze the elements of the crime of profiteering and key strategies for dealing with investigations. I. I didn't receive any money, so why does it constitute "profiteering"?…

過失致死,過失致死罪

No time to dodge! Woman in Taoyuan dies while taking out the trash… Family breaks down in tears upon seeing her body. Lawyer Li Yusheng explains the legal elements and court rulings regarding whether driving constitutes negligent homicide.

No Time to Dodge! Taoyuan Woman Dies While Taking Out the Garbage… Family Members Break Down in Tears Upon Seeing Her Body | Next TV News, Era News Reporter Yang Ya-zhu News Link: At around 6 PM yesterday (23rd) in Guishan, Taoyuan, a fatal collision occurred involving a recycling truck, resulting in injuries to seven people. Among them, a 78-year-old woman surnamed Qiu died from her injuries after being rushed to the hospital. The woman's family members rushed to the Taoyuan Funeral Home that evening for an autopsy, and the atmosphere at the scene was somber. As for the 52-year-old driver surnamed Wu, he is still receiving treatment in the hospital and has not yet regained consciousness. Lawyer Li Yu-sheng of Fuda Law Firm stated that whether the driver will be held criminally liable depends mainly on whether he was aware that he had a medical condition that might lead to dangerous driving. If he knew that he might have a sudden illness but still insisted on driving, and caused an accident due to his physical condition, then he might be…

證券交易法,操縱股價罪

The first-generation "young stock market genius," Hsiao Han-sen, was released on bail of NT$15 million with three restrictions on his investment activities. Lawyer Li Yu-sheng explains the elements and criminal liability of the crime of stock manipulation under the Securities and Exchange Act.

Hsiao Han-sen, known as Taiwan's first-generation "teenage stock market god," has been released on bail of NT$15 million and is subject to three restrictions on leaving the country and residing abroad. According to Li Yu-sheng, a lawyer at Fidelity Law Firm, the suspect intended to influence the value of stock trading through artificial means, violating the Securities and Exchange Act's crime of stock price manipulation. The maximum penalty is 10 years imprisonment and a fine of up to NT$200 million. The court has currently set bail at NT$15 million, but considering the potential illegal profits of over NT$40 million, the bail amount may be slightly too low. [Line online consultation hotline, legal consultation at Fidelity Law Firm Li…]

偷拍,刑法妨害秘密罪

A Taipei Metro thug was caught taking upskirt photos of attractive women; his phone was found to contain over 600 private photos. Lawyer Li Yusheng explains the provisions and penalties of the Criminal Code regarding invasion of privacy.

Taipei MRT Pervert Caught Taking Upskirt Photos of Women; Over 600 Private Photos Found on His Phone | Next TV News, Era News Reporters Lin Minjing and Chen Ruixiang News Link: A pervert was caught taking upskirt photos at Taipei's Zhongshan MRT station around 4 PM yesterday (11th). A 31-year-old man surnamed Du is suspected of hiding his phone in his bag and taking upskirt photos of women. He was discovered by the victim's boyfriend and immediately stopped. The suspect hurriedly fled towards Eslite Bookstore, but was stopped by police officers on patrol. According to police investigation, the suspect had been loitering in the vicinity before the crime, and his phone contained over 600 private photos of other women. When caught taking upskirt photos, he appeared to try to delete the photos. Du not only refused to admit to the crime but also claimed that all the indecent photos were taken accidentally by pressing the camera function. However, according to the investigation…

社會秩序維護法,刑法恐嚇危害安全罪

Taipei Metro in a panic! Passenger rushes through turnstile without swiping card, brandishes notice board as a threat! Another disturbance on the Taipei Metro; station staff intervene, thankfully no one injured. (This is in accordance with the Social Order Maintenance Act and the crime of intimidation.)

Taipei Metro Horror! Passenger rushes through turnstile without card, brandishes notice board as a threat! Another disturbance on Taipei Metro; station staff intervene, thankfully no one injured | Sanlih News reporter Wang Yi-chi, Gu Yuan-song. News Link: Lawyer Li Yu-sheng of Fuda Law Firm stated that the perpetrator's act of brandishing an object as a threat constitutes disturbing the public in a public place. According to the Social Order Maintenance Act, this is punishable by up to 3 days of detention or a fine of up to NT$30,000. If it frightens those around, it may also constitute the crime of intimidation and endangering safety under the Criminal Code, punishable by up to two years of imprisonment, detention, or a fine of up to NT$9,000. While it may not reach the point of imprisonment, a 3-month prison sentence could be commuted to a NT$90,000 fine. Line online consultation hotline legal consultation Fuda…