The scandal at Guangze Clinic has escalated, with two managers detained and five construction workers released on bail. (Reported by Huang Ling-hsuan, Mirror News) The Guangze Clinic voyeurism case is far from over! Police launched a search on the 7th, taking two clinic managers into custody for investigation. Both were subsequently detained on the 9th due to their significant involvement. Even five construction workers were taken into custody for allegedly assisting in dismantling the equipment and destroying evidence. They were released on bail of NT$500,000 late on the 9th. Police do not rule out further searches. Lawyer Li Yu-sheng of Fidelity Law Firm stated that if the managers are suspected of knowing about or ordering the recording, they will be considered accomplices in violating privacy laws and unauthorized recording of sexually explicit images. If underage victims are involved, they will also be guilty of a serious crime under the Child and Youth Sexual Exploitation Act. The managers are currently overseas. The prosecutor has summoned them…

The Aierli Self-Help Group, with 800 members, has exceeded its group limit, leading to a surge of over 200 complaints. Aierli announces a "full refund" policy, with no deduction for gifts and no handling fees. (Reported by Cao Wenning, CTi News) News Link: The well-known chain medical aesthetics group Aierli has been embroiled in a hidden camera scandal. Police and prosecutors are currently searching all branches across Taiwan and reviewing patient records to identify potential victims. However, during the investigation, it was discovered that a surveillance engineer surnamed Xie had received instructions from higher-ups to dismantle and even format the surveillance mainframes in 10 branches in central and northern Taiwan, attempting to destroy evidence. Furthermore, it was found that minors were also filmed. Lawyer Li Yusheng of Fidelity Law Firm stated that he had previously received…

The Aierli voyeurism scandal continues to escalate; equipment supplier claims senior management instructed them to "destroy evidence" │ Mirror News reporter Zhang Jinghan News Link: The well-known chain medical aesthetics group Aierli has been embroiled in a voyeurism scandal. Police and prosecutors are currently searching all branches across Taiwan and reviewing patient records to identify potential victims. However, during the investigation, it was discovered that a surveillance engineer surnamed Xie had received prior instructions from senior management to dismantle and even format the mainframes of surveillance cameras in 10 branches in central and northern Taiwan, attempting to destroy evidence. Furthermore, it was discovered that minors were also filmed. Lawyer Li Yusheng of Fidelity Law Firm stated that while consumers of medical aesthetic procedures are usually adults, if minors have visited clinics for related treatments and been secretly filmed, the case could escalate into a case under the Child and Youth Sexual Exploitation Prevention Act…

Hidden Camera Scandals Erupt in Clinic Area; Health Bureau Raids Banqiao Branch | TVBS News Reporter Guo Ying News Link: The Erli Group has been embroiled in a hidden camera scandal. New Taipei City consumer protection officials and health bureau personnel raided the Banqiao branch to confirm refund matters. However, a former employee came forward accusing the company of requiring employees to post reviews and delaying salary payments. Although the equipment manufacturer stated that installing surveillance cameras was illegal, legal experts analyze that to become a cooperating witness, one must provide evidence helpful to the case, but the chances are low when the criminal activity is clear. Attorney Xu Wanwei of Fidelity Law Firm stated that a cooperating witness must assist in clarifying the case, provide crucial evidence of the crime, and be deemed by the prosecutor to have substantial help in the case before they can be considered. This hidden camera case…

Chang Shu-yuan, accused of murdering his wife and children for insurance fraud, remained silent throughout the 40-question trial. | TVBS News Reporter Guo Ying News Link: Continuing to follow this case, the New Taipei District Court held intensive hearings last month. Chang Shu-yuan exercised his right to remain silent in the face of as many as 40 questions from the prosecutor and judge, setting a precedent for public participation in the trial. However, legal experts analyze that although he exercised his right to remain silent, the judge will still sentence him based on the relevant evidence, and may even consider his poor attitude after the crime, resulting in a heavier sentence. Lawyer Li Yu-sheng of Fidelity Law Firm stated that although the defendant is legally entitled to remain silent, the judge can still conduct the trial based on the existing evidence. If the judge reviews the relevant materials and asks questions to the defendant, and the defendant exercises his right to remain silent, it is equivalent to giving up the opportunity to defend himself…

Ko Wen-je faces another case? The demolition of the Zhongxiao Bridge approach road is suspected of involving bribery; Taipei District Prosecutors Office is investigating. | FTV News reporter Huang Guocheng. News Link: Ko Wen-je, the founding chairman of the Taiwan People's Party, was sentenced to 17 years in prison in the first instance for corruption; there may be more unexploded bombs to come. Last week, the Agency Against Corruption summoned witnesses to investigate the Ko government's "Zhongxiao Bridge approach road demolition project." The witnesses' petitions have now been released, directly pointing out that the construction methods did not match the tender specifications. The safer but more expensive "cutting method" was changed to a cheaper but dangerous "breaking method," reducing the project cost from NT$310 million to less than NT$30 million. The Taipei District Prosecutors Office is also investigating this as a separate case. Lawyer Li Yusheng of Fuda Law Firm stated that Huangchang Construction's construction methods did not match the tender specifications, which may involve forgery, fraud, etc. Further investigation will determine if the Taipei City…