iPhone回收價「崩到1500」! 民眾疑「機台撞傷」|TVBS新聞

How can I prove and claim compensation for scratches on my iPhone after sending it to a recycling center? | Lawyer Li Yusheng explains

News Headline: iPhone Trade-in Price "Plunges to NT$1500"! Consumers Suspect "Machine Damage" Media Source: TVBS News Reporter: Cao Wenning News Link: News Summary According to TVBS News, after repeatedly submitting their iPhone 14s to automatic recycling machines for valuation, consumers discovered chipped corners and scratches, and the trade-in offer dropped to NT$1500, leading them to suspect the damage was caused by the machine. The company stated that they need to confirm the cause, and if it is indeed caused by the machine, they will be responsible. The key issue is the phone's condition before and after the testing and the cause of the damage; currently, the company's responsibility cannot be determined solely based on the price drop. Lawyer Li Yusheng's Explanation: Lawyer Li Yusheng of Fidelity Law Firm reminded consumers in the news report that they should take complete photos or videos before submitting the phone for testing to preserve its original appearance, which can help prove that the subsequent damage was caused by…

警搜同志酒吧掀議 蔣兩度道歉.沈盼避免污名化

Can searching for gay bars allow you to treat all customers present as criminals caught in the act? | Lawyer Li Yusheng explains

News Headline: Police Search of Gay Bar Sparks Controversy; Mayor Chiang Apologizes Twice, Hopes to Avoid Stigmatization Media Source: CTS News Reporter: Huang Aotian News Link: News Summary According to CTS News, Taipei City police searched the Ximen gay bar on October 3, 2026, taking in several people present. The enforcement methods and statements made by some officers sparked controversy. The mayor of Taipei publicly apologized on October 5 and stated that a review would be conducted. The legal focus of this incident lies in whether the search, arrest, and subsequent actions were all based on evidence, and whether individuals could be presumed guilty solely based on the type of venue or their presence. Lawyer Li Yusheng Explains: Lawyer Li Yusheng of Fidelity Law Firm pointed out in an interview that even if used items are found at the scene, it is not necessarily sufficient to conclude that every consumer was committing a crime at the time; in the absence of other clear evidence…

房仲以李多慧宣傳招攬「當鄰居」 經紀人:已反映

Does a real estate agent's use of "being neighbors with Lee Da-hye" to attract buyers infringe on personal data and privacy? | Lawyer Lee Yu-sheng explains

News Headline: Real Estate Agent Uses Lee Da-hye's Name to Solicit "Being Neighbors"; Agent: Reported; Media Source: CTS News; Reporter: Huang Rou-rong; News Link: News Summary: According to CTS News, a real estate agent used "being neighbors with Lee Da-hye" as a selling point on social media, sparking speculation about the celebrity's residential area. The agent's agency stated that they have reported the matter through formal channels without the celebrity's or the company's consent; the real estate agency responded that they will strengthen education on this matter. This article does not disclose or relay any specific residential information to avoid expanding privacy risks. Lawyer Li Yu-sheng's Explanation: Lawyer Li Yu-sheng of Fidelity Law Firm pointed out in an interview that a celebrity's name paired with specific community information may constitute personal data; using it for commercial solicitation without consent involves privacy rights, name rights, and may also violate the Personal Data Protection Act. Public figures…

陽信銀行驚爆內鬼協助詐貸2.49億 「婚紗教父」移送北檢-民視新聞

Yangxin Bank is suspected of fraudulently obtaining 249 million yuan in loans. What responsibilities do the bank's internal staff bear? | Lawyer Li Yusheng explains.

News Headline: Yangshin Bank Shocked by Insider Scandal: "Wedding Dress Godfather" Transferred to Taipei District Prosecutors Office for NT$249 Million Loan Fraud Media Source: FTV News Reporter: Huang Enlin News Link: News Summary According to FTV News, a former manager of Yangshin Bank's Guting branch and others are suspected of assisting businesses in falsifying financial statements and overestimating collateral between 2019 and 2020, involving two loans totaling NT$249 million. On October 6, 2026, prosecutors searched and questioned relevant personnel, and a well-known wedding dress company is also involved in the investigation. The above content constitutes suspected criminal activity under investigation and is not a confirmed guilty verdict. Lawyer Li Yusheng Explains: Lawyer Li Yusheng of Fidelity Law Firm explained in the news that applying for loans with false information may involve fraud, breach of trust, and document offenses; if bank employees intentionally violate their duties and cause losses to the bank…

知名女裝爆倒閉! 儲值金恐泡湯.員工怨欠薪

LOVFEE closes down; can I get my prepaid balance back? | Lawyer Li Yusheng explains

News Headline: Well-known Women's Clothing Brand Collapses! Prepaid Values May Be Lost, Employees Complain of Unpaid Wages Media Source: TVBS News Reporter: Cao Wenning News Link: News Summary According to TVBS News, the chain women's clothing brand LOVFEE is reportedly facing operational difficulties and disputes over unpaid wages for its employees. Members are worried that they will not be able to get back their unused prepaid values. The company has announced the closure of operations and opened refund applications, and the Consumer Protection Officer has also intervened to investigate. Consumers should keep records of the announcement and application, and should not rely solely on verbal promises; the actual refund progress still needs to be confirmed with the company and the competent authorities. Lawyer Li Yusheng's Explanation In an interview, lawyer Li Yusheng of Fidelity Law Firm reminded consumers to first keep records of prepaid values, invoices, proof of payment, and screenshots of their membership balance; those who paid by credit card should contact their issuing bank as soon as possible to inquire about the disputed amount. If…

50對50股東談不攏怎麼辦?先分股權轉讓、買斷、公司收買與法院解散

What if 50 shareholders can't reach an agreement? The options are: equity transfer, buyout, company takeover, and court dissolution.

In a 50-50 shareholder deadlock, don't immediately equate "exit" with a company refunding money. First, confirm whether the company is a limited liability company, a general joint-stock company, or a closed corporation. Confirm the actual shareholding and voting rights of each party, and whether the board seats are also equally allocated. Examine the articles of association and shareholder agreement for mechanisms regarding share transfer, pre-emptive rights, purchase and sale rights, valuation, or exit. Shareholders' capital investment in the company is not, in principle, a loan; they cannot demand the company return their initial investment simply because they no longer wish to continue operating. Truly feasible exits typically involve buyouts by other shareholders, transfers to a third party, exits by contract, or, if legally required, corporate law procedures. A company's own repurchase of its own shares is restricted by corporate law; "demanding a company buyback" is not a right automatically granted to all shareholders. Imagine two friends starting a business together, each contributing 50% (1 share, 3 shares, 4 shares). Initially, it seems fair. But when disputes arise, the 50-50 situation can escalate...