公司收到國稅局調帳、查稅通知怎麼辦?

What should a company do if it receives a tax audit or accounting adjustment notice from the State Taxation Administration? Do these 7 things before the initial explanation.

Before your first response to a notification from the IRS, do these seven things: First, confirm the notifying authority, tax category, year, reason for investigation, and scope of required information. Don't rush to explain transactions from memory; first, connect the contracts, invoices, ledgers, payments, and actual performance. Confirm whether the IRS is truly questioning revenue, costs, input tax credits, related-party transactions, or the authenticity of the transactions. The company's finance department, accountant, and legal counsel must use the same set of objective facts; do not provide conflicting versions of events. Do not delete, create, backdate, or modify original transaction documents and electronic records. If the investigation involves false documentation, fictitious transactions, tax evasion, or liability of company officials, simultaneously assess administrative penalties and criminal risks. Before attending the questioning, confirm whether you need a lawyer, accountant, or other representative/assistant. Many company tax disputes don't begin with receiving a tax penalty. The real starting point may simply be a letter…

好心扶跌倒婦人「反挨告」!法官判賠「還勸行善」全網怒?

Helping a woman who has fallen can lead to a lawsuit; lawyer Li Yusheng explains emergency assistance and conditions for exemption from liability.

News Headline: Good Samaritan Helps Falling Woman, "Sued Instead"! Judge Orders Compensation, "Also Encourages Others to Do Good," Sparks Outrage Online?! │ CTV News 20261017 Media Source: CTV News Reporter: Lin Miaoru News Link: News Summary According to CTV News, a retired professor saw a woman lose her balance at a subway station and reached out to help her, but failed. He was subsequently sued for negligent injury, sparking a discussion about the risks of helping others. It is important to distinguish that the party involved later clarified that the NT$110,000 was a settlement he chose after considering the time and cost of litigation, not a court order requiring him to pay compensation; a settlement does not mean the court has determined that his rescue was negligent. Lawyer Li Yusheng Explains: Lawyer Li Yusheng of Fidelity Law Firm explained in an interview that in order to eliminate imminent danger to another person's life or body, taking necessary and reasonable rescue measures…

沒付錢不等於偷! 師超商拿80元茶葉蛋無罪

Forgetting to pay for tea eggs leads to acquittal; lawyer Li Yusheng analyzes intent to steal and evidence.

News Headline: Not Paying Doesn't Equal Stealing! Teacher Not Guilty for Taking 80 Yuan Tea Eggs from Convenience Store Media Source: TTV News Reporter: Tsai Hsin-yu News Link: News Summary According to TTV News, a tutor in Chiayi took eight tea eggs, totaling 80 yuan, from a convenience store and left without paying. He was indicted for theft. The teacher claimed he was in a hurry to teach and forgot to pay. The first instance court, considering CCTV footage and related circumstances, acquitted him. The second instance court rejected the prosecution's appeal, and the case was finalized. The point of contention wasn't just whether he paid, but whether he could prove he had the subjective intent to steal. Lawyer Li Yu-sheng from Fidelity Law Firm explained that theft requires not only the objective act of taking another person's property but also the subjective intent to steal. According to the news report in this case, the prosecution failed to provide sufficient evidence…

閃兵案首波宣判出爐 9藝人自首團全獲緩刑,行使偽造文書跟詐欺罪

Nine celebrities in the "Flash Soldier" case received suspended sentences; lawyer Li Yusheng explains surrender, plea bargaining, and accompanying conditions.

News Headline: First Wave of Verdicts Announced in Celebrity Refugee Case: 9 Celebrities Surrender and All Receive Suspended Sentences - FTV News Media Source: FTV News Reporter: Huang Enlin News Link: News Summary According to FTV News, the New Taipei District Court issued its first wave of first-instance verdicts on October 20, 2026, in the celebrity refugee case. All nine celebrities who voluntarily surrendered received suspended sentences of 3 to 4 years, with conditions including paying a certain amount to the public treasury and providing community service. The conscripts involved were accused of evading military service by providing false medical information through a group. This verdict is a first-instance result for specific defendants and does not represent the same treatment for other cases still under trial. Lawyer Li Yusheng's Explanation: Lawyer Li Yusheng of Fidelity Law Firm analyzed in an interview that the court considered the defendants' voluntary surrender, confession of their crimes, and expression of remorse, and then considered each individual's specific circumstances…

河口湖台灣旅客命案,日本跟台灣都有審判權

Lawyer Li Yusheng analyzes the case of the murder of a Taiwanese tourist at Lake Kawaguchi and Taiwan's judicial authority.

News Headline: Kawaguchiko Murder Case in Japan! Taiwanese Woman Found Dead in Hotel Room During Tour; Female Suspect Acquainted for Less Than 30 Hours Stabbed to the Neck with a 12cm Kitchen Knife [600-Second Headline] Media Source: ETtoday News Reporter: Hsu Cheng-hsuan News Link: News Summary According to ETtoday News, a Taiwanese woman was found dead in her hotel room in the Kawaguchiko area of Japan during a tour. Another Taiwanese woman was arrested by Japanese police at the scene with a knife. The relationship between the two women, the details of the crime, and the motive are still under investigation; different reports have given varying descriptions of whether they were on the same tour or in the same room, so it is inappropriate to draw conclusions based on these discrepancies. Besides the local Japanese investigation procedures, whether Taiwan also has the right to prosecute and try such cases has become a focus of attention. Lawyer Li Yu-sheng from Fidelity Law Firm explains: In an interview, lawyer Li Yu-sheng pointed out that the crime…

恐嚇危害安全罪,恐嚇公眾罪,刑事律師推薦

Why was a person acquitted for making a public threat? Attorney Xu Wanwei analyzes the crime of intimidating the public.

News Headline: Man Posts Warning of Next Zhang Wen! "Acquitted on Second Trial" Media Source: TTV News Reporter: Wu Routing News Link: News Summary According to TTV News, a man posted online after the Taipei MRT random attack, mentioning the possibility of another wave of attacks, and was prosecuted for public intimidation. He was acquitted in the first trial, and the second trial rejected the prosecution's appeal, upholding the acquittal. The report indicated that the court considered the post to be a speculation about possible future events, not an expression of intent to commit harm. Lawyer Hsu Wan-wei Explains: Lawyer Hsu Wan-wei of Fidelity Law Firm explained in an interview that the key issue in this case is whether it constitutes public intimidation. According to the court's judgment mentioned in the news, the post was a prediction of future events and did not express an intention to commit harm; therefore, it was not found guilty of public intimidation. …